• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症相关死亡率、资源利用和医疗保健成本:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。

Sepsis-Associated Mortality, Resource Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):215-227. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004777.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004777
PMID:33372748
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine long-term mortality, resource utilization, and healthcare costs in sepsis patients compared to hospitalized nonsepsis controls.

DESIGN

Propensity-matched population-based cohort study using administrative data.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

We identified a cohort of adults (≥ 18) admitted to hospitals in Ontario between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, with follow-up to March 31, 2017. Sepsis patients were flagged using a validated International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision-coded algorithm (Sepsis-2 definition), including cases with organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) and without (nonsevere). Remaining hospitalized patients were potential controls. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 on propensity score, age, sex, admission type, and admission date.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Differences in mortality, rehospitalization, hospital length of stay, and healthcare costs were estimated, adjusting for remaining confounders using Cox regression and generalized estimating equations. Of 270,669 sepsis cases, 196,922 (73%) were successfully matched: 64,204 had severe and 132,718 nonsevere sepsis (infection without organ dysfunction). Over follow-up (median 2.0 yr), severe sepsis patients had higher mortality rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.63-1.68). Both severe and nonsevere sepsis patients had higher rehospitalization rates than controls (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.50-1.55 and hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.40-1.43, respectively). Incremental costs (Canadian dollar 2018) in sepsis cases versus controls at 1-year were: $29,238 (95% CI, $28,568-$29,913) for severe and $9,475 (95% CI, $9,150-$9,727) for nonsevere sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe sepsis was associated with substantially higher long-term risk of death, rehospitalization, and healthcare costs, highlighting the need for effective postdischarge care for sepsis survivors.

摘要

目的

与住院非脓毒症对照相比,检查脓毒症患者的长期死亡率、资源利用和医疗保健成本。

设计

使用行政数据进行倾向匹配的基于人群的队列研究。

地点

加拿大安大略省。

患者

我们确定了一组 2012 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 31 日期间在安大略省住院的成年人(≥18 岁),随访至 2017 年 3 月 31 日。使用经过验证的国际疾病分类,第 10 修订版编码算法(脓毒症 2 定义)标记脓毒症患者,包括有器官功能障碍(严重脓毒症)和无器官功能障碍(非严重脓毒症)的病例。其余住院患者为潜在对照。病例和对照在倾向得分、年龄、性别、入院类型和入院日期上进行 1:1 匹配。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

使用 Cox 回归和广义估计方程,在调整其他混杂因素后,估计死亡率、再入院、住院时间和医疗保健成本的差异。在 270669 例脓毒症病例中,有 196922 例(73%)成功匹配:64204 例有严重脓毒症,132718 例非严重脓毒症(无器官功能障碍的感染)。在随访期间(中位数为 2.0 年),严重脓毒症患者的死亡率高于对照组(风险比,1.66;95%置信区间,1.63-1.68)。严重和非严重脓毒症患者的再入院率均高于对照组(风险比,1.53;95%置信区间,1.50-1.55 和风险比,1.41;95%置信区间,1.40-1.43)。与对照组相比,1 年内脓毒症病例的增量成本(2018 年加拿大元)为:严重脓毒症为 29238 美元(95%置信区间,28568-29913),非严重脓毒症为 9475 美元(95%置信区间,9150-9727)。

结论

严重脓毒症与长期死亡、再入院和医疗保健成本的风险显著增加相关,突出了需要为脓毒症幸存者提供有效的出院后护理。

相似文献

1
Sepsis-Associated Mortality, Resource Use, and Healthcare Costs: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.脓毒症相关死亡率、资源利用和医疗保健成本:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):215-227. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004777.
2
The association of lacking insurance with outcomes of severe sepsis: retrospective analysis of an administrative database*.缺乏保险与严重脓毒症结局的关系:行政数据库的回顾性分析*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):583-91. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000435667.15070.9c.
3
A multicentre, prospective study to evaluate costs of septic patients in Brazilian intensive care units.一项评估巴西重症监护病房脓毒症患者费用的多中心前瞻性研究。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(5):425-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826050-00006.
4
Epidemiology and Costs of Postsepsis Morbidity, Nursing Care Dependency, and Mortality in Germany, 2013 to 2017.德国 2013 至 2017 年脓毒症发病后发病率、护理依赖和死亡率的流行病学和成本
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134290. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34290.
5
Long-term Health Care Utilization and Associated Costs After Dialysis-Treated Acute Kidney Injury in Children.儿童透析治疗的急性肾损伤后的长期医疗保健利用及相关费用
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Jan;81(1):79-89.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Risk Factors at Index Hospitalization Associated With Longer-term Mortality in Adult Sepsis Survivors.索引住院期间的危险因素与成人脓毒症幸存者的长期死亡率相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194900. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4900.
7
Preadmission Use of Calcium Channel Blocking Agents Is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Sepsis: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.入院前使用钙通道阻滞剂与脓毒症患者预后改善相关:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1500-1508. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002550.
8
Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.重症患者的医院获得性血流感染。住院时间延长、额外费用及归因死亡率。
JAMA. 1994 May 25;271(20):1598-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.271.20.1598.
9
Community-, Healthcare-, and Hospital-Acquired Severe Sepsis Hospitalizations in the University HealthSystem Consortium.大学卫生系统联盟中社区获得性、医疗保健相关性和医院获得性严重脓毒症住院情况
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1945-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001164.
10
Epidemiology of Hospital-Onset Versus Community-Onset Sepsis in U.S. Hospitals and Association With Mortality: A Retrospective Analysis Using Electronic Clinical Data.美国医院中医院获得性与社区获得性脓毒症的流行病学:一项使用电子临床数据的回顾性分析。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1169-1176. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003817.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Measures of Fluid Responsiveness to Guide Resuscitation in Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.动态评估液体反应性以指导脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的复苏:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Sep 15;7(9):e1303. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001303. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
2
Healthcare costs after sepsis: a systematic review.脓毒症后的医疗费用:一项系统综述。
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 22;29(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05600-7.
3
The American Society for Microbiology's evidence-based laboratory medicine practice guidelines for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections using rapid tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
美国微生物学会关于使用快速检测诊断血流感染的循证实验室医学实践指南:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Sep 11;38(3):e0013724. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00137-24. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
4
Public knoweldge of sepsis in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.沙特阿拉伯公众对脓毒症的认知:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 30;104(22):e42643. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042643.
5
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sepsis incidence, etiology and hospitalization costs in France: a retrospective observational study.新冠疫情对法国脓毒症发病率、病因及住院费用的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11000-7.
6
Sepsis research in Canada: An environmental scan of sepsis investigators, research, and funding.加拿大的脓毒症研究:对脓毒症研究人员、研究及资金的环境审视
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 29;5(4):e0003606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003606. eCollection 2025.
7
"Sepsis brought him to his knees": exploring the lived experiences and perspectives of sepsis survivors and family members to inform a sepsis public education campaign in Canada.“脓毒症让他不堪一击”:探索脓毒症幸存者及其家属的亲身经历和观点,为加拿大的脓毒症公众教育活动提供参考。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22344-9.
8
Quality of guidelines for infection management in sepsis: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.脓毒症感染管理指南的质量:使用AGREE II工具进行的批判性评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02491-8.
9
The effect of registered nurse staffing and skill mix on length of stay and hospital costs.注册护士人员配备和技能组合对住院时间和医院成本的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 Mar-Apr;73(2):102356. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2025.102356. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
10
To Hemoadsorb or Not to Hemoadsorb-Do We Have the Answer Yet? An Updated Meta-Analysis on the Use of CytoSorb in Sepsis and Septic Shock.进行血液吸附还是不进行血液吸附——我们有答案了吗?关于在脓毒症和感染性休克中使用CytoSorb的最新荟萃分析。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 13;13(1):180. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010180.