Baranoski Jacob F, Koester Stefan W, Przybylowski Colin J, Zhao Xiaochun, Catapano Joshua S, Gandhi Sirin, Tayebi Meybodi Ali, Cole Tyler S, Lee Jonathan, Frisoli Fabio A, Lawton Michael T, Mascitelli Justin R
Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Oper Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 16;20(3):252-259. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa362.
Use of the far lateral transcondylar (FL) approach and vagoaccessory triangle is the standard exposure for clipping most posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms. However, a distal PICA origin or high-lying vertebrobasilar junction can position the aneurysm beyond the vagoaccessory triangle, making the conventional FL approach inappropriate.
To demonstrate the utility of the extended retrosigmoid (eRS) approach and a lateral trajectory through the glossopharyngo-cochlear triangle as the surgical corridor for these cases.
High-riding PICA aneurysms treated by microsurgery were retrospectively reviewed, comparing exposure through the eRS and FL approaches. Clinical, surgical, and outcome measures were evaluated. Distances from the aneurysm neck to the internal auditory canal (IAC), jugular foramen, and foramen magnum were measured.
Six patients with PICA aneurysms underwent clipping using the eRS approach; 5 had high-riding PICA aneurysms based on measurements from preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). Mean distances of the aneurysm neck above the foramen magnum, below the IAC, and above the jugular foramen were 27.0 mm, 3.7 mm, and 8.2 mm, respectively. Distances were all significantly lower versus the comparison group of 9 patients with normal or low-riding PICA aneurysms treated using an FL approach (P < .01). All 6 aneurysms treated using eRS were completely occluded without operative complications.
The eRS approach is an important alternative to the FL approach for high-riding PICA aneurysms, identified as having necks more than 23 mm above the foramen magnum on CTA. The glossopharyngo-cochlear triangle is another important anatomic triangle that facilitates microsurgical dissection.
采用远外侧经髁(FL)入路和迷走神经副神经三角是夹闭大多数小脑后下动脉(PICA)动脉瘤的标准术野暴露方式。然而,PICA远端起源或高位椎基底动脉交界处可使动脉瘤位于迷走神经副神经三角之外,导致传统的FL入路并不适用。
展示扩大乙状窦后(eRS)入路及经舌咽-耳蜗三角的外侧入路轨迹作为这些病例手术通道的实用性。
对采用显微手术治疗的高位PICA动脉瘤进行回顾性分析,比较eRS入路和FL入路的暴露情况。评估临床、手术及预后指标。测量动脉瘤颈至内耳道(IAC)、颈静脉孔和枕大孔的距离。
6例PICA动脉瘤患者采用eRS入路夹闭;根据术前计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)测量,5例为高位PICA动脉瘤。动脉瘤颈至枕大孔上方、IAC下方及颈静脉孔上方的平均距离分别为27.0 mm、3.7 mm和8.2 mm。与采用FL入路治疗的9例正常或低位PICA动脉瘤的对照组相比,这些距离均显著更低(P <.01)。采用eRS治疗的所有6例动脉瘤均完全闭塞,无手术并发症。
对于CTA显示动脉瘤颈位于枕大孔上方超过23 mm的高位PICA动脉瘤,eRS入路是FL入路的重要替代方法。舌咽-耳蜗三角是另一个有助于显微手术解剖的重要解剖三角。