School of Archaeological and Forensic Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244058. eCollection 2020.
While death is universal, reactions to death and ways of dealing with the dead body are hugely diverse, and archaeological research reveals numerous ways of dealing with the dead through time and across the world. In this paper, findings are presented which not only demonstrate the power of archaeology to promote and aid discussion around this difficult and challenging topic, but also how our approach resulted in personal growth and professional development impacts for participants. In this interdisciplinary pilot study, archaeological case studies were used in 31 structured workshops with 187 participants from health and social care backgrounds in the UK, to explore their reactions to a diverse range of materials which documented wide and varied approaches to death and the dead. Our study supports the hypothesis that the past is a powerful instigator of conversation around challenging aspects of death, and after death care and practices: 93% of participants agreed with this. That exposure to archaeological case studies and artefacts stimulates multifaceted discourse, some of it difficult, is a theme that also emerges in our data from pre, post and follow-up questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews. The material prompted participants to reflect on their biases, expectations and norms around both treatment of the dead, and of bereavement, impacting on their values, attitudes and beliefs. Moreover, 87% of participants believed the workshop would have a personal effect through thinking differently about death and bereavement, and 57% thought it would impact on how they approached death and bereavement in their professional practice. This has huge implications today, where talk of death remains troublesome, and for some, has a near-taboo status-'taboo' being a theme evident in some participants' own words. The findings have an important role to play in facilitating and normalising discussions around dying and bereavement and in equipping professionals in their work with people with advanced illness.
虽然死亡是普遍存在的,但人们对死亡的反应和处理尸体的方式却大不相同,考古学研究揭示了随着时间的推移和在世界各地处理死者的众多方式。本文介绍了考古学不仅在促进和帮助讨论这个困难和具有挑战性的话题方面具有强大的力量,而且还展示了我们的方法如何为参与者带来个人成长和专业发展影响的发现。在这项跨学科的初步研究中,考古案例研究被用于英国卫生和社会保健背景的 187 名参与者的 31 次结构化研讨会上,以探讨他们对记录广泛多样的死亡和死者处理方法的各种材料的反应。我们的研究支持了这样一个假设,即过去是引发关于死亡和死亡后护理和实践的挑战性方面的对话的有力因素:93%的参与者同意这一观点。接触考古案例研究和文物会激发多方面的讨论,其中一些是困难的,这也是我们从预、后和后续问卷调查以及半结构化访谈中数据中出现的一个主题。这些材料促使参与者反思他们在处理死者和丧亲方面的偏见、期望和规范,从而影响他们的价值观、态度和信仰。此外,87%的参与者认为研讨会将通过对死亡和丧亲的不同思考对他们个人产生影响,而 57%的参与者认为这将影响他们在专业实践中对待死亡和丧亲的方式。在当今社会,这具有重要意义,因为死亡的话题仍然令人困扰,对一些人来说,它几乎具有禁忌地位——“禁忌”是一些参与者自己的话语中明显的主题。这些发现对于促进和规范有关临终和丧亲的讨论以及为处理晚期疾病患者的专业人员提供支持具有重要作用。