• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我挫败的医学伦理准则及其修复:COVID-19 应对失败及其他。

Self-Defeating Codes of Medical Ethics and How to Fix Them: Failures in COVID-19 Response and Beyond.

机构信息

Carnegie Mellon University.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jan;21(1):4-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845854.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2020.1845854
PMID:33373555
Abstract

Statements of the core ethical and professional responsibilities of medical professionals are incomplete in ways that threaten fundamental goals of medicine. First, in the absence of explicit guidance for responding to cases in which there is significant uncertainty or disagreement about the relative therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic merits of available interventions they perpetuate self-defeating practices. Second, without addressing the role of advertising in shaping patient and community preferences they risk creating moral loopholes that bypass and undermine professional duties of fidelity, honesty and transparency. In both cases, these flaws are exacerbated by an individualism that ignores the critical role of health systems in managing and reducing uncertainty and conflict over best practices, and in communicating with and shaping the expectations of the public. These points are illustrated with examples from the response to COVID-19 and suggestions for reform are proposed.

摘要

医学专业人员的核心伦理和专业责任声明在威胁医学基本目标的方面存在不完整之处。首先,在缺乏明确指导的情况下,应对那些在现有干预措施的治疗、预防或诊断价值方面存在重大不确定性或分歧的情况时,这些声明会延续自我挫败的做法。其次,这些声明没有解决广告在塑造患者和社区偏好方面的作用,从而有可能制造道德漏洞,规避和破坏忠实、诚实和透明等专业职责。在这两种情况下,这种缺陷因忽视卫生系统在管理和减少不确定性以及在最佳实践方面的冲突,以及在与公众沟通和塑造其期望方面的关键作用而更加严重。这些观点通过对 COVID-19 应对措施的举例来说明,并提出了改革建议。

相似文献

1
Self-Defeating Codes of Medical Ethics and How to Fix Them: Failures in COVID-19 Response and Beyond.自我挫败的医学伦理准则及其修复:COVID-19 应对失败及其他。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jan;21(1):4-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845854.
2
[Ethical tribulations of COVID-19: the sinister ominous, existential responsibility and Medice, Cura Te Ipsum].[新冠疫情的伦理困境:险恶不祥、生存责任与医乃仁术,先治己身]
Rev Med Chil. 2020 Nov;148(11):1668-1673. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872020001101668.
3
Broadening the Scope of Moral Responsibility of Clinicians: What Medical Ethics Can Learn from Public Health Ethics.拓展临床医生道德责任的范围:医学伦理学可从公共卫生伦理学中学到什么。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jan;21(1):17-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845871.
4
Expert Communication and the Self-Defeating Codes of Scientific Ethics.专家交流与自我挫败的科学伦理准则
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jan;21(1):24-26. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845862.
5
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
6
Ethical dilemmas and professional roles in occupational medicine.职业医学中的伦理困境与专业角色
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(10):1367-74. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90274-7.
7
Codes of Ethics, Human Rights and Forced Migration.《伦理准则、人权与被迫迁移》
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Jan;21(1):31-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1845855.
8
Codes and morals: is there a missing link? (The Nuremberg Code revisited).法规与道德:是否存在缺失的环节?(再探《纽伦堡法典》)
Med Health Care Philos. 1998;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1009980118082.
9
The promises and limitations of codes of medical ethics as instruments of policy change.医学伦理准则作为政策变革工具的前景与局限
Bioethics. 2023 May;37(4):406-415. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13143. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
10
Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic.应对医护人员在新冠疫情期间面临的心理健康挑战。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1211.

引用本文的文献

1
A patient-reported questionnaire for evaluating utilization of the National Essential Public Health Service Program in China among older adults with hypertension and diabetes.一份用于评估中国国家基本公共卫生服务项目在高血压和糖尿病老年人中利用情况的患者报告问卷。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;13:1459754. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1459754. eCollection 2025.
2
EXPERTISE, DISAGREEMENT, and TRUST IN VACCINE SCIENCE AND POLICY. The importance of transparency in a world of experts.疫苗科学与政策方面的专业知识、分歧和信任。专家世界中透明度的重要性。
Diametros. 2025 Feb 27;22(82):7-27. doi: 10.33392/diam.1871.
3
The Fragility of Scientific Rigour and Integrity in "Sped up Science": Research Misconduct, Bias, and Hype and in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
“加速科学”中科学严谨性与诚信的脆弱性:研究不当行为、偏见、炒作与新冠疫情
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Dec;20(4):607-616. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10289-w. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Bayes and the Evidence Base: Reanalyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus.贝叶斯与证据基础:使用多种先验概率重新分析试验无助于达成共识。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):483-484. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP.
5
Taking a moral holiday? Physicians' practical identities at the margins of professional ethics.休道德假?职业道德边缘地带的医生的实际身份。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 21;50(9):626-633. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108500.
6
Artificial intelligence in medicine: Overcoming or recapitulating structural challenges to improving patient care?人工智能在医学领域:克服还是再现改善患者护理的结构性挑战?
Cell Rep Med. 2022 May 17;3(5):100622. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100622. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Some Patients Are More Equal Than Others: Variation in Ventilator Settings for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.有些患者比其他患者更“平等”:2019冠状病毒病急性呼吸窘迫综合征通气设置的差异
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Oct 14;3(10):e0555. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000555. eCollection 2021 Oct.