Frank Fabian, Hecht Markus, Loy Florian, Rutzner Sandra, Fietkau Rainer, Distel Luitpold
Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 22;9(1):1. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010001.
(1) Background: Individualization of treatment is a major challenge in oncology and requires a variety of predictive and prognostic parameters. In addition to tumor biology analyses, baseline health-related quality of life might be a valid tool to predict overall survival. This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic relevance of baseline quality of life data in patients with rectal cancer. In this context, differences between patients with and without distant metastases were of particular interest. (2) Methods: Our cohort included 258 patients with rectal cancer treated in the radiotherapy department of the University Hospital Erlangen. Patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ C30) and colorectal cancer questionnaire (CR38). Clinical and survival data were provided by the Gießener Tumor Documentation System (GTDS) of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany). Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and univariate and multivariate Cox regression. (3) Results: A cohort of 258 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma was analyzed including 50 patients (19.4%) with metastatic disease. No differences were observed between patients with and without distant metastases in most areas of quality of life studied, with the exception of physical function, loss of appetite, chemotherapy side effects and weight loss. Gender, baseline physical function, sexual function, diarrhea, and weight loss over time had a prognostic value in the entire cohort. Appetite loss was an additional prognostic parameter in patients with distant metastases. (4) Conclusions: The quality of life of patients with metastatic disease differed only slightly from non-metastatic patients. Health-related quality of life data provide prognostic information for patients with rectal cancer.
(1)背景:治疗个体化是肿瘤学中的一项重大挑战,需要多种预测和预后参数。除肿瘤生物学分析外,基线健康相关生活质量可能是预测总生存期的有效工具。本研究旨在评估直肠癌患者基线生活质量数据的预后相关性。在此背景下,有远处转移和无远处转移患者之间的差异尤为令人关注。(2)方法:我们的队列包括在埃尔朗根大学医院放疗科接受治疗的258例直肠癌患者。患者完成了欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)核心生活质量问卷(QLQ C30)和结直肠癌问卷(CR38)。临床和生存数据由埃尔朗根 - 埃姆讷综合癌症中心(CCC,德国埃尔朗根 - 纽伦堡弗里德里希 - 亚历山大大学,埃尔朗根)的吉森肿瘤文档系统(GTDS)提供。使用Kaplan - Meier分析以及单变量和多变量Cox回归进行统计分析。(3)结果:对258例直肠腺癌患者的队列进行了分析,其中50例(19.4%)患有转移性疾病。在所研究的生活质量的大多数领域,有远处转移和无远处转移的患者之间未观察到差异,但身体功能、食欲减退、化疗副作用和体重减轻除外。性别、基线身体功能、性功能、腹泻以及随时间的体重减轻在整个队列中具有预后价值。食欲减退是有远处转移患者的另一个预后参数。(4)结论:转移性疾病患者的生活质量与非转移性患者仅略有不同。健康相关生活质量数据为直肠癌患者提供预后信息。