Speech Therapy Program, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Health Sciences Faculty, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):279-298. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00066. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
Purpose This systematic review aimed to analyze the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the severity of tinnitus when compared to no therapy or other modalities of therapies. Method A systematic review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the Registration Number CRD42019119376. A search was performed in each of the following databases: EMBASE, LILACS, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The inclusion criteria consisted of studies in adults over 16 years of age, randomized clinical trials in which subjects presented chronic (≥ 6 months) and subjective tinnitus (unilateral or bilateral) as well as with or without bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, and studies that used only LLLT for treatment of tinnitus compared to no-therapy group or other modalities of therapy. No language or time restrictions were stipulated. The references were managed by Endnote Web and Rayyan QCRI. Results After the screening process, seven studies remained that attained the eligibility criteria. Regarding the risk of bias, only one study was categorized as low risk of bias; the six remaining studies were classified as moderate risk of bias. The seven included studies mainly assessed the LLLT effects on tinnitus by Visual Analogue Scale, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, pitch and loudness matching, minimum masking level, and pure-tone audiometry. All the seven selected studies found different degrees of significant results regarding tinnitus severity; however, there was no consensus among the results. Conclusion Even though the LLLT showed positive effects in the tinnitus severity in some studies, it is not possible yet to make any recommendation over its uses for the treatment of tinnitus severity.
目的 本系统评价旨在分析低水平激光疗法(LLLT)与无治疗或其他治疗方式相比,对耳鸣严重程度的影响。
方法 本系统评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中进行了注册,注册号为 CRD42019119376。在以下每个数据库中进行了检索:EMBASE、LILACS、PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science、Google Scholar 和 ProQuest。纳入标准包括:16 岁以上成年人的研究;随机临床试验,其中受试者患有慢性(≥6 个月)和主观性耳鸣(单侧或双侧),伴或不伴双侧感音神经性听力损失;以及仅使用 LLLT 治疗耳鸣而不与无治疗组或其他治疗方式进行比较的研究。未规定语言或时间限制。参考文献由 Endnote Web 和 Rayyan QCRI 管理。
结果 经过筛选过程,仍有七项研究符合纳入标准。关于偏倚风险,仅有一项研究被归类为低偏倚风险;其余六项研究被归类为中度偏倚风险。这七项纳入的研究主要通过视觉模拟量表、耳鸣残疾量表、音调和响度匹配、最小掩蔽级和纯音听阈评估 LLLT 对耳鸣的影响。所有七项选定的研究都发现了不同程度的耳鸣严重程度的显著结果;然而,结果并不一致。
结论 尽管 LLLT 在一些研究中显示出对耳鸣严重程度的积极影响,但目前还不能推荐其用于治疗耳鸣严重程度。