Suppr超能文献

低强度激光疗法治疗耳鸣的疗效:一项系统评价及荟萃分析与试验序贯分析

Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Tinnitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Chih-Hao, Huang Chii-Yuan, Chang Chun-Yu, Cheng Yen-Fu

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.

Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):931. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120931.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Tinnitus is a common disorder characterized by sound in the ear in the absence of external or internal stimuli. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was discovered enhancing tissue repair via increasing the blood microcirculation and cell proliferation in 1960s. In the last two decades, LLLT delivered to the cochlea has frequently been used to reduce the severity of tinnitus. However, whether LLLT effectively attenuates the severity of tinnitus remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy on adult patients with complaints of tinnitus.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT).

MEASUREMENTS

Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score; improvement rates of the visual analog scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception through 17 September 2020. Randomized control trials that involved adult patients with complaints of tinnitus, compared LLLT to a placebo and provided sufficient information for meta-analysis were considered eligible.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, 11 studies involving 670 patients were included. No significant difference in the overall effect according to the THI score (mean difference (MD), -2.85; 95% CI, -8.99 to 3.28; = 0.362; = 0%) and the rating scale score improvement rate (risk ratio (RR), 1.35; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.27; = 0.250; = 67%) was demonstrated between patients receiving LLLT and those receiving a placebo. None of the subgroup analyses showed significant differences, regardless of underlying sensorineural hearing loss, the number of irradiation sessions or the wavelength used.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that the value of LLLT in controlling the severity of tinnitus remains unclear, in part due to the relatively small number of patients and underlying heterogeneity. More large-scale investigations of LLLT for tinnitus related to inner ear disease are required to further elucidate the therapeutic effects.

摘要

研究目的

耳鸣是一种常见病症,其特征为在无外部或内部刺激时耳朵里出现声音。低强度激光疗法(LLLT)于20世纪60年代被发现可通过增加血液微循环和细胞增殖来促进组织修复。在过去二十年中,作用于耳蜗的低强度激光疗法经常被用于减轻耳鸣的严重程度。然而,低强度激光疗法是否能有效减轻耳鸣严重程度仍存在争议。我们旨在评估低强度激光疗法对有耳鸣主诉的成年患者的疗效。

设计

采用试验序贯分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。

干预措施

低强度激光疗法(LLLT)。

测量指标

耳鸣障碍量表(THI)评分;视觉模拟量表(VAS)、言语评定量表(VRS)和数字评定量表(NRS)评分的改善率。

方法

我们检索了从创刊至2020年9月17日的PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。纳入涉及有耳鸣主诉成年患者、将低强度激光疗法与安慰剂进行比较并提供足够荟萃分析信息的随机对照试验。

主要结果

总体而言,纳入了11项研究,共670例患者。接受低强度激光疗法的患者与接受安慰剂的患者在根据耳鸣障碍量表评分得出的总体效应(平均差(MD),-2.85;95%置信区间,-8.99至3.28;P = 0.362;I² = 0%)以及评定量表评分改善率(风险比(RR),1.35;95%置信区间,0.81至2.27;P = 0.250;I² = 67%)方面均未显示出显著差异。无论是否存在潜在的感音神经性听力损失、照射次数或所用波长,亚组分析均未显示出显著差异。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,低强度激光疗法在控制耳鸣严重程度方面的价值仍不明确,部分原因是患者数量相对较少以及存在潜在的异质性。需要更多关于低强度激光疗法治疗与内耳疾病相关耳鸣的大规模研究,以进一步阐明其治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0301/7761002/a4f6a9fa928f/brainsci-10-00931-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验