Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 May;35(5):1351-1357. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.065. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
This study aimed to compare, in a cohort of critically ill children with biventricular anatomy and no cardiovascular shunt, cardiac output (CO) and cardiac index (CI) assessed by echocardiography and a continuous pulse-contour method, MostCare, to measure the differences between these techniques (biasCO and biasCI), and their association with clinical variables.
Retrospective study.
Tertiary pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.
Children admitted to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit who underwent echocardiography with CO measurement.
None.
Thirty-five patients were included. BiasCO was -0.02 (0.26) L/min (percentage error 36%). BiasCI was 0.07 (0.34) L/min/m (percentage error 18%). Biases and percentage errors were higher in 24 nonsupervised echocardiographies. A negative biasCO (overestimation by MostCare) was associated with post-surgical status (v cardiomyopathy), higher systolic arterial pressure, and spontaneous breathing (v intubation). When only absolute values were considered, biasCO correlated with age, weight, arterial pressure, and heart rate, whereas biasCI was associated with a femoral arterial cannula, no use of inotropes, and the absence of mechanical ventilation. After adjustment, biasCO remained independently associated with patients' body weight(p = 0.0001). BiasCI showed a nonlinear relationship with weight below 20 kg and above 40 kg.
Children with extreme low or high weights, those who are extubated, and those with a femoral cannula carry the highest bias. When younger patients are considered, CI should be evaluated instead of CO, because biases are better highlighted by indexing data on body surface area. In children, both echocardiography and MostCare may be responsible of inaccurate CO/CI assessment.
本研究旨在比较经胸超声心动图(echocardiography)和 MostCare 连续脉搏轮廓法(a continuous pulse-contour method)评估的有双心室解剖结构且无心血管分流的危重症儿童心输出量(cardiac output,CO)和心指数(cardiac index,CI),以评估这两种技术之间的差异(CO 偏差和 CI 偏差)及其与临床变量的相关性。
回顾性研究。
三级儿科心脏重症监护病房。
在儿科心脏重症监护病房接受超声心动图 CO 测量的患儿。
无。
共纳入 35 例患儿。CO 偏差为-0.02(0.26)L/min(百分比误差 36%)。CI 偏差为 0.07(0.34)L/min/m(百分比误差 18%)。24 例非监护下的超声心动图测量结果偏差和百分比误差较高。MostCare 高估 CO(即 CO 负偏差)与术后状态(与心肌病相反)、较高的收缩压和自主呼吸(与插管相反)相关。仅考虑绝对值时,CO 偏差与年龄、体重、动脉压和心率相关,而 CI 偏差与股动脉插管、未使用正性肌力药和无机械通气相关。调整后,CO 偏差仍与患者体重独立相关(p=0.0001)。CI 偏差与体重低于 20 kg 和高于 40 kg 呈非线性关系。
极低或极高体重、已拔管和股动脉插管的患儿偏差最大。对于年龄较小的患者,应评估 CI 而非 CO,因为通过将数据指数化到体表面积上可以更好地突出偏差。在儿童中,超声心动图和 MostCare 都可能导致 CO/CI 评估不准确。