Nieto Valerie K, Eagle Iwonka, Mishler Samantha, Rulli Danielle
J Dent Hyg. 2020 Winter;94(6):65-71.
Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) have been established as a gold standard assessment for determining clinical competence. The Coalition for Dental Licensure Reform called for the acceptance of the Dental Licensure Objective Structured Clinical Examination (DLOSCE) to replace the live-patient examinations (LPE) for dental licensure, which are often viewed as biased, unreliable, and in some cases unethical. The purpose of this study was to assess dental hygiene program directors' awareness of and attitudes toward the DLOSCE, whether their curricula included OSCEs, and perceived barriers to implementing OSCEs. A nine-question electronic survey was developed, and pilot tested by five-dental hygiene program directors across three-dental hygiene institutions. The survey was emailed to the directors of all dental hygiene program directors in the United States (n=332). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. A response rate of 36% (n=121) was achieved. Nearly 30% of respondents were unaware of the developing DLOSCE, however, the majority (80%) were in favor of the acceptance of the examination. Nearly three-quarters of the respondents considered OSCEs as valid assessments of clinical competence, however, over half of the respondents reported not currently utilizing OSCEs in their curricula. Barriers reported were time (22%), perceived lack of best practices (21%), and lack of resources (18%). Respondents who currently employed OSCEs were more likely to agree they were both valid and reliable assessments (=0.05). The majority of dental hygiene program directors were in favor of eliminating the single-encounter LPE in favor of an OSCE for licensure. However, more than half do not currently utilize OSCEs for clinical assessments. Further studies are needed to explore implementation of OSCEs in dental hygiene education, and how a potential dental hygiene licensure OSCE might impact the current curricula and licensure of dental hygienists in the United States.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCEs)已被确立为确定临床能力的黄金标准评估方式。牙科执照改革联盟呼吁采用牙科执照客观结构化临床考试(DLOSCE)来取代用于牙科执照颁发的真人患者考试(LPE),后者常被视为存在偏见、不可靠且在某些情况下不道德。本研究的目的是评估口腔卫生项目主任对DLOSCE的认识和态度,他们的课程是否包括OSCEs,以及实施OSCEs的感知障碍。开发了一份包含九个问题的电子调查问卷,并由来自三个口腔卫生机构的五名口腔卫生项目主任进行了预测试。该调查问卷通过电子邮件发送给了美国所有口腔卫生项目主任(n = 332)。使用描述性统计分析数据。获得了36%(n = 121)的回复率。近30%的受访者不知道正在开发的DLOSCE,然而,大多数(80%)赞成接受该考试。近四分之三的受访者认为OSCEs是对临床能力的有效评估,然而,超过一半的受访者报告目前在其课程中未使用OSCEs。报告的障碍包括时间(22%)、认为缺乏最佳实践(21%)和资源不足(18%)。目前采用OSCEs的受访者更有可能同意它们是有效且可靠的评估(P = 0.05)。大多数口腔卫生项目主任赞成取消单次接触的LPE,而支持采用OSCEs进行执照颁发。然而,超过一半的人目前未将OSCEs用于临床评估。需要进一步研究来探索OSCEs在口腔卫生教育中的实施情况,以及潜在的口腔卫生执照OSCE可能如何影响美国当前口腔卫生工作者的课程和执照颁发。