• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

72小时内急诊复诊的频率、原因及结果:一项回顾性观察研究

Frequency, Causes, and Outcomes of Return Visits to the Emergency Department Within 72 Hours: A Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Alshahrani Mohammed, Katbi Faisal, Bahamdan Yazeed, Alsaihati Ahrar, Alsubaie Aisha, Althawadi Dana, Perlas-Asonto Laila

机构信息

Departments of Emergency and Critical Care, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Al-Khobar, 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Department of Emergency Medicine, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 22;13:2003-2010. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S282192. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S282192
PMID:33376340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7764850/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) serve as an accessible gateway to healthcare system wherein numerous patients consider it a prime choice for medical complaints. Frequency of ED revisits, causes, and its burden are necessary to assess quality of care provided to patients and identify factors that leads to revisit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Electronic and printed medical records of all patients who revisited ED from January to May 2016 within 72 hours of initial visit were reviewed. Patients' cause of revisit were classified to three categories: patient-, physician- and system-related factors. Common complaints that require revisits were also collected. Descriptive analysis was performed and categorical variables were represented by the frequency; percentages and continuous variables were presented as median, and range if data did not follow normal distribution.

RESULTS

Of the 79,279 patients who visited ED during the study period, 1.3% (1000) patients revisited within 72 hours; 51.3% (n=513) were males, with a mean age of 31.5 years (SD=17.7 years) where majority (57.1%) had no comorbidity recorded. The most attributed factors for revisit were as follows: patient-related causes 635 patients (63.5%), physician-related factors 167 patients (16.7%), and system-related factors 42 patients (4.2%); 15.6% were found not related to the initial visit. Recurrence of the same complaint was the highest among patient-related factors (80.5%), inadequate management and no improvement of symptoms in 71.3% among the physician-related factors. The most common ED revisit complaint was fever 29.1% (n=291). Outcomes of the revisit were mainly patient discharge 96.7% (n=967), admission 1.2% (n=12) and death in 0.2% (n=2).

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of the same complaint with no symptoms improvement and suboptimal management of physicians contributed to most of the ED revisits within 72 hours. Encouraging physicians to provide clear instructions in educating patients on discharge regarding disease progression and its red flags as to when a return to ED, might help in reducing revisit rate.

摘要

背景

急诊科是医疗系统的一个便捷入口,许多患者将其视为就医投诉的首选。评估急诊科复诊的频率、原因及其负担对于评估提供给患者的医疗质量以及识别导致复诊的因素至关重要。

患者与方法

回顾了2016年1月至5月期间在首次就诊后72小时内复诊急诊科的所有患者的电子和纸质病历。将患者复诊的原因分为三类:患者相关因素、医生相关因素和系统相关因素。还收集了需要复诊的常见投诉。进行了描述性分析,分类变量用频率表示;百分比,连续变量以中位数表示,若数据不呈正态分布则给出范围。

结果

在研究期间就诊于急诊科的79279名患者中,1.3%(1000名)患者在72小时内复诊;51.3%(n = 513)为男性,平均年龄31.5岁(标准差 = 17.7岁),其中大多数(57.1%)没有合并症记录。复诊的最主要因素如下:患者相关原因635例患者(63.5%),医生相关因素167例患者(16.7%),系统相关因素42例患者(4.2%);15.6%被发现与首次就诊无关。在患者相关因素中,同一投诉的复发率最高(80.5%),在医生相关因素中,管理不足和症状无改善的占71.3%。急诊科最常见的复诊投诉是发热,占29.1%(n = 291)。复诊结果主要是患者出院96.7%(n = 967),入院1.2%(n = 12),死亡0.2%(n = 2)。

结论

同一投诉复发且症状无改善以及医生管理欠佳是导致72小时内大多数急诊科复诊的原因。鼓励医生在患者出院时就疾病进展及其红色警示(即何时返回急诊科)向患者提供明确的指导,可能有助于降低复诊率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/e9498d904d94/JMDH-13-2003-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/053f72692e84/JMDH-13-2003-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/14af1b877908/JMDH-13-2003-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/7655aa07fda2/JMDH-13-2003-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/e9498d904d94/JMDH-13-2003-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/053f72692e84/JMDH-13-2003-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/14af1b877908/JMDH-13-2003-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/7655aa07fda2/JMDH-13-2003-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9048/7764850/e9498d904d94/JMDH-13-2003-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequency, Causes, and Outcomes of Return Visits to the Emergency Department Within 72 Hours: A Retrospective Observational Study.72小时内急诊复诊的频率、原因及结果:一项回顾性观察研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 22;13:2003-2010. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S282192. eCollection 2020.
2
ED Revisits Within 72 Hours to a Tertiary Health Care Facility in Dubai: A Descriptive Study.72小时内再次前往迪拜一家三级医疗机构就诊情况:一项描述性研究
Cureus. 2023 Mar 28;15(3):e36807. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36807. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Revisits within 48 Hours to a Thai Emergency Department.48小时内再次前往泰国急诊科就诊情况。
Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:8983573. doi: 10.1155/2016/8983573. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
4
Characteristics of an Unscheduled Emergency Department Revisit Within 72 hours of Discharge.出院后72小时内非计划重返急诊科的特征。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23975. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Characteristics of unscheduled emergency department return visit patients within 48 hours in Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院48小时内非计划急诊复诊患者的特征
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Dec;94 Suppl 7:S73-80.
6
A Retrospective Nested Cohort Study of Emergency Department Revisits for Migraine in New York City.一项针对纽约市急诊偏头痛复诊的回顾性巢式队列研究。
Headache. 2018 Mar;58(3):399-406. doi: 10.1111/head.13216. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
[Unscheduled revisits in medical emergency units at the hospital: incidence and related factors].
Med Clin (Barc). 1999 May 8;112(16):610-5.
8
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with emergency department revisits within 72 hours and subsequent admission to the intensive care unit.72小时内急诊科复诊并随后入住重症监护病房患者的特征及结局
Tzu Chi Med J. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
9
Factors Associated with Family Physician Follow-up 30 Days Post-discharge from a Local Canadian Community Emergency Department.加拿大当地社区急诊科出院后30天家庭医生随访的相关因素
Cureus. 2020 Feb 16;12(2):e7008. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7008.
10
Identifying return visits to the Emergency Department: A multi-centre study.识别急诊复诊患者:一项多中心研究。
Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Mar;24(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Previous Emergency Department Visit Information on Care of Current Patients.既往急诊科就诊信息对当前患者护理的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 17;26(4):815-822. doi: 10.5811/westjem.40047.
2
Assessing artificial intelligence-generated patient discharge information for the emergency department: a pilot study.评估急诊科人工智能生成的患者出院信息:一项试点研究。
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 25;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00885-5.
3
Enhanced Diagnostic Precision in Revisited Emergency Patients via Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Tool for Emergency Department Quality Management.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital.新加坡一家三级医院急诊科72小时内复诊患者的特征。
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jun;57(6):301-6. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016104.
2
A conceptual framework for improved analyses of 72-hour return cases.用于改进72小时复诊病例分析的概念框架。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;33(1):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
3
Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve.患者返回急诊科:时间返回曲线。
通过床旁超声提高复诊急诊患者的诊断准确性:急诊科质量管理的一项工具
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Mar 18;18:1549-1556. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S507075. eCollection 2025.
4
The risk factors of the 72-h unscheduled return visit admission to emergency department in adults below 50 years old.50 岁以下成年人急诊 72 小时内非计划性再次就诊的风险因素。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Sep 27;28(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01317-x.
5
Healthcare-associated adverse events and readmission to the emergency departments within seven days after a first consultation.首次就诊后七天内与医疗保健相关的不良事件和重新入院至急诊科。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 7;11:1189939. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189939. eCollection 2023.
6
ED Revisits Within 72 Hours to a Tertiary Health Care Facility in Dubai: A Descriptive Study.72小时内再次前往迪拜一家三级医疗机构就诊情况:一项描述性研究
Cureus. 2023 Mar 28;15(3):e36807. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36807. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Shock Index and Characteristics of "Bounce-Back" Patients in the Emergency Department of King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC): A Retrospective Analysis.阿卜杜拉国王医疗城急诊科“反弹”患者的休克指数及特征:一项回顾性分析
Cureus. 2022 Sep 28;14(9):e29692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29692. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):864-71. doi: 10.1111/acem.12442. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
4
Unscheduled return visits (URV) in adults to the emergency department (ED): a rapid evidence assessment policy review.成人非计划重返急诊科就诊情况:快速证据评估政策审查
Emerg Med J. 2015 Apr;32(4):324-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202719. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
5
The prevalence of quality issues and adverse outcomes among 72-hour return admissions in the emergency department.急诊科72小时再入院患者中质量问题和不良结局的发生率。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.012. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
6
Paediatric unplanned reattendance rate: A&E clinical quality indicators.儿科非计划性复诊率:急症室临床质量指标。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Mar;98(3):211-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302836. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
7
A national depiction of children with return visits to the emergency department within 72 hours, 2001-2007.2001 - 2007年全国范围内72小时内复诊至急诊科的儿童情况描述。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jul;28(7):606-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31825cf7cf.
8
Emergency department crowding: time for interventions and policy evaluations.急诊科拥挤:是时候进行干预和政策评估了。
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:838610. doi: 10.1155/2012/838610. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
9
Emergency medicine-quality indicators: the United Kingdom perspective.急诊医学质量指标:英国视角。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1239-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01223.x.
10
The ecology of medical care in Taiwan.台湾的医疗保健生态。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Sep;74(9):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 23.