Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 发病率较低的地区,根据分诊评分,SARS-CoV-2 大流行对神经急症室就诊患者的影响存在差异。

Differential effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on patients presenting to a neurological emergency room depending on their triage score in an area with low COVID-19 incidence.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2021 Oct;28(10):3332-3338. doi: 10.1111/ene.14709. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on neurologic emergencies, depending on the patients' triage score in a setting with relatively few COVID-19 cases and without lack of resources.

METHODS

Consecutive patients of a tertiary care center with a dedicated neurologic emergency room (nER) were analyzed. The time period of the first lockdown in Germany (calendar weeks 12-17, 2020) was retrospectively compared to the corresponding period in 2019 regarding the number of patients presenting to the nER, the number of patients with specific triage scores (Heidelberg Neurological Triage Score), the number of patients with stroke, and the quality of stroke care.

RESULTS

A total of 4330 patients were included. Fewer patients presented themselves in 2020 compared to 2019 (median [interquartile range] per week: 134 [118-143] vs. 187 [182-192]; p = 0.015). The median numbers of patients per week with triage 1 (emergent) and 4 (non-urgent) were comparable (51 [43-58] vs. 59 [54-62]; p = 0.132, and 10 [4-16] vs. 16 [7-18]; p = 0.310, respectively).The median number of patients per week declined in categories 2 and 3 in 2020 (41 [37-45] vs. 57 [52-61]; p = 0.004, and 28 [23-35] vs. 61 [52-63]; p = 0.002, respectively. No change was observed in the absolute number of strokes (138 in 2019 and 141 in 2020). Quality metrics of stroke revascularization therapies (symptom-to-door time, door-to-needle time or relative number of therapies) and stroke severity remained constant.

CONCLUSION

During the lockdown period in 2020, the number of patients with emergent symptoms remained constant, while fewer patients with urgent symptoms presented to the nER. This may imply behavioral changes in care-seeking behavior.

摘要

背景

我们分析了 SARS-CoV-2 大流行对神经急症的影响,这是在 COVID-19 病例相对较少且资源不短缺的环境下根据患者分诊评分进行的。

方法

对一家设有专门神经急症室(nER)的三级护理中心的连续患者进行了分析。回顾性比较了德国首次封锁期间(2020 年第 12-17 周)与 2019 年同期的 nER 就诊患者数量、特定分诊评分(海德堡神经分诊评分)患者数量、中风患者数量以及中风治疗质量。

结果

共纳入 4330 例患者。与 2019 年相比,2020 年就诊患者较少(中位数[四分位间距]每周:134[118-143] vs. 187[182-192];p=0.015)。每周分诊 1 级(紧急)和 4 级(非紧急)患者的中位数人数相当(51[43-58] vs. 59[54-62];p=0.132,和 10[4-16] vs. 16[7-18];p=0.310)。2020 年,2 级和 3 级患者每周的中位数人数均下降(41[37-45] vs. 57[52-61];p=0.004,和 28[23-35] vs. 61[52-63];p=0.002)。2019 年和 2020 年中风患者的绝对数量没有变化(分别为 138 例和 141 例)。溶栓治疗的质量指标(症状出现至进入医院的时间、进入医院至溶栓开始的时间或治疗的相对数量)和中风严重程度保持不变。

结论

在 2020 年封锁期间,有紧急症状的患者数量保持不变,而到 nER 就诊的有紧急症状的患者数量减少。这可能意味着患者寻求治疗的行为发生了变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验