Biogeography and Global Change Department, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Spanish National Research Council, MNCN-CSIC, C/Serrano 115 bis, Madrid, E-28006, Spain.
Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution Department, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, C/ José Antonio Novais, 12, Madrid, E-28040, Spain.
Conserv Biol. 2021 Aug;35(4):1063-1072. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13687. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Urban growth is a major threat to biodiversity conservation at the global scale. Its impacts are expected to be especially detrimental when it sprawls into the landscape and reaches sites of high conservation value due to the species and ecosystems they host, such as protected areas. I analyzed the degree of urbanization (i.e., urban cover and growth rate) from 2006 to 2015 in protected sites in the Natura 2000 network, which, according to the Habitats and Birds Directives, harbor species and habitats of high conservation concern in Europe. I used data on the degree of land imperviousness from COPERNICUS to calculate and compare urban covers and growth rates inside and outside Natura 2000. I also analyzed the relationships of urban cover and growth rates with a set of characteristics of Natura sites. Urban cover inside Natura 2000 was 10 times lower than outside (0.4% vs. 4%) throughout the European Union. However, the rates of urban growth were slightly higher inside than outside Natura 2000 (4.8% vs. 3.9%), which indicates an incipient urban sprawl inside the network. In general, Natura sites affected most by urbanization were those surrounded by densely populated areas (i.e., urban clusters) that had a low number of species or habitats of conservation concern, albeit some member states had high urban cover or growth rate or both in protected sites with a large number of species or habitats of high conservation value. Small Natura sites had more urban cover than large sites, but urban growth rates were highest in large Natura sites. Natura 2000 is protected against urbanization to some extent, but there is room for improvement. Member states must enact stricter legal protection and control law enforcement to halt urban sprawl into protected areas under the greatest pressure from urban sprawl (i.e., close to urban clusters). Such actions are particularly needed in Natura sites with high urban cover and growth rates and areas where urbanization is affecting small Natura sites of high conservation value, which are especially vulnerable and concentrated in the Mediterranean region.
城市扩张是全球范围内生物多样性保护的主要威胁。当城市扩张蔓延到具有高保护价值的地点时,如保护区,预计其影响将特别不利,因为这些地点拥有丰富的物种和生态系统。我分析了 2006 年至 2015 年期间,在欧洲受《栖息地指令》和《鸟类指令》保护的自然 2000 网络中保护区内的城市化程度(即城市覆盖范围和增长率)。我利用哥白尼计划提供的土地不透水数据来计算和比较自然 2000 内外的城市覆盖范围和增长率。我还分析了城市覆盖范围和增长率与自然地点特征之间的关系。整个欧盟范围内,自然 2000 内的城市覆盖范围比自然 2000 外低 10 倍(0.4%比 4%)。然而,自然 2000 内的城市增长率略高于自然 2000 外(4.8%比 3.9%),这表明网络内的城市扩张正在萌芽。一般来说,受城市化影响最大的自然地点是那些被人口密集区(即城市集群)包围的地点,这些地点的保护关注物种或栖息地数量较少,尽管一些成员国在拥有大量具有高保护价值的物种或栖息地的保护区内的城市覆盖范围或增长率或两者都很高。小的自然地点的城市覆盖范围比大的地点大,但大的自然地点的城市增长率最高。自然 2000 在一定程度上受到了城市化的保护,但仍有改进的空间。成员国必须颁布更严格的法律保护,并加强执法力度,以阻止城市扩张蔓延到受城市扩张压力最大的保护区(即靠近城市集群的保护区)。在城市覆盖范围和增长率较高的自然地点,以及城市化正在影响具有高保护价值的小型自然地点的地区,特别是在易受影响且集中在地中海地区的地区,尤其需要采取这些行动。