• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Home-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost-utility and budget impact analyses.泰国 III 期结肠癌患者的家庭化疗:成本效用和预算影响分析。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(3):1027-1033. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3690. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
2
Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.美国老年 IV 期结肠癌患者中奥沙利铂或伊立替康为基础的方案与 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸单独治疗的比较和成本效益。
Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;118(12):3173-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26613. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
3
Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Thailand.泰国III期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的成本效用分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):687-700. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.972379. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Stage III Colon Cancer Treatment at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.退伍军人事务医疗中心Ⅲ期结肠癌辅助治疗的成本效益分析
Oncol Res. 2014;22(5-6):311-9. doi: 10.3727/096504015X14424348426152.
5
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.奥沙利铂和卡培他滨辅助治疗结肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(41):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-185. doi: 10.3310/hta10410.
6
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in Taiwan.卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为辅助治疗台湾 III 期结肠癌的药物经济学分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in the US.美国奥沙利铂与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙辅助治疗III期结肠癌的成本效益分析
Cancer. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):1082-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22512.
8
Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy for stage III colon cancer in Japan based on the MOSAIC trial.基于 MOSAIC 试验的日本 III 期结肠癌辅助 FOLFOX 治疗的成本效益。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Innovative chemotherapies for stage III colon cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.III期结肠癌的创新化疗:一项成本效益研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):1903-9.
10
Cost-utility analysis of chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with stage III colon cancer.老年III期结肠癌患者化疗方案的成本效用分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Oct;32(10):1005-13. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0180-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivery of intravenous anti-cancer therapy at home versus in hospital or community settings for adults with cancer.成年癌症患者在家中与在医院或社区环境中接受静脉抗癌治疗的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD014861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014861.pub2.
2
Experiences and perceptions of patients with cancer receiving home-based chemotherapy: a qualitative systematic review protocol.癌症患者接受家庭化疗的体验和看法:一项定性系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 28;13(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02659-1.
3
Patient Satisfaction Survey on Portable Infusion Pumps for Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy: Hard-Shelled or Soft-Shelled?结直肠癌化疗用便携式输液泵的患者满意度调查:硬壳还是软壳?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 8;18:1443-1449. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S463291. eCollection 2024.
4
National expert consensus on home-administered oncologic therapies in Spain.西班牙居家肿瘤治疗国家专家共识
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 16;14:1335344. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1335344. eCollection 2024.
5
Home infusion services in Saudi Arabia: Where are we standing?沙特阿拉伯的家庭输液服务:我们目前处于什么状况?
Saudi Pharm J. 2023 Oct;31(10):101750. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101750. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
6
"It's a part of the patient": The experiences of patients with cancer undergoing home-based chemotherapy from patients' and nurses' perspectives.“这是患者的一部分”:从患者和护士的角度看癌症患者居家化疗的经历
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Apr 22;9(8):100072. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.04.011. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Contingency planning for cancer care in low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment for future disaster resilience.低收入和中等收入国家在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的癌症护理应急规划:对未来灾难恢复力的快速评估
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Jan 6;16:1339. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1339. eCollection 2022.
8
Is the Scope of Costs Considered in Budget Impact Analyses for Anticancer Drugs Rational? A Systematic Review and Comparative Study.抗癌药物预算影响分析中考虑的成本范围是否合理?系统评价和比较研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 5;9:777199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.777199. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of adverse events and health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer receiving ambulatory home-based chemotherapy in Thailand.评价在泰国接受门诊家庭化疗的结直肠癌患者的不良事件和与健康相关的生活质量。
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3036-3044. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1016. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of COVID-19 for patients with cancer.癌症患者感染新冠病毒的风险。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):e181. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30149-2. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Coverage of cancer services in Australia and providers' views on service gaps: findings from a national cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚癌症服务覆盖范围及提供者对服务缺口的看法:全国横断面调查研究结果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5649-6.
3
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2018.NCCN 指南解读:结肠癌,第 2.2018 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Apr;16(4):359-369. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0021.
4
National and Subnational Population-Based Incidence of Cancer in Thailand: Assessing Cancers with the Highest Burdens.泰国全国及地方基于人群的癌症发病率:评估负担最重的癌症。
Cancers (Basel). 2017 Aug 17;9(8):108. doi: 10.3390/cancers9080108.
5
A multi-method review of home-based chemotherapy.基于家庭的化疗的多方法综述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep;25(5):883-902. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12408. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
6
Mapping the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-general or -Colorectal to SF-6D in Chinese patients with colorectal neoplasm.将癌症治疗功能评估-一般或-结直肠量表与中国结直肠肿瘤患者的 SF-6D 进行映射。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):495-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
7
Pharmacoeconomic aspects of FOLFIRI or FOLFOX regimens administered with a fully ambulatory pump compared to the day hospital setting.与日间医院环境相比,使用全可移动泵给药的FOLFIRI或FOLFOX方案的药物经济学方面。
Tumori. 2010 May-Jun;96(3):438-42. doi: 10.1177/030089161009600310.
8
Economic and patient-reported outcomes of outpatient home-based versus inpatient hospital-based chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer.门诊家庭为基础的与住院医院为基础的化疗对结直肠癌患者的经济学和患者报告结局比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):971-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0917-7. Epub 2010 May 23.
9
Cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in Canada.奥沙利铂在加拿大结肠癌辅助治疗中的成本效益分析。
Curr Oncol. 2010 Feb;17(1):17-24. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i1.436.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in the US.美国奥沙利铂与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙辅助治疗III期结肠癌的成本效益分析
Cancer. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):1082-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22512.

泰国 III 期结肠癌患者的家庭化疗:成本效用和预算影响分析。

Home-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost-utility and budget impact analyses.

机构信息

Department of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(3):1027-1033. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3690. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.3690
PMID:33377629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7897966/
Abstract

Home-based chemotherapy (HC) is a new treatment alternative to hospital-based chemotherapy treatment (IP) and is administered via portable intravenous pumps at the patient's home. HC reduces the demand for inpatient bed capacity in hospitals and reduces the cost of an infusion. This study takes a societal perspective while conducting the cost-utility and budget impact analyses (BIA) of HC and IP with an mFOLFOX6 regimen on patients with stage III colon cancer. We conducted a cost-utility analysis with a 6-month time horizon. The parameter inputs for the model were gathered from a retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok. The resource usage of HC and IP was determined based on medical records. The per-unit direct medical, home health service, and adverse events (AE) management costs were gathered from the standard cost list. The health outcome of treatment was measured in terms of quality-adjusted life years. Disutility related to AE was calculated. We conducted a sensitivity analysis for the uncertainty results and performed BIA based on the societal perspective on a 1-year time horizon. HC provided a cost-saving of $1,513.37 per patient for the period of treatment. Thus, assuming 526 patients per year, the use of HC could achieve a cumulative annual cost-saving of $828,436. HC is a cost-saving strategy compared to IP for stage III colon cancer treatment. We recommend that the service reimbursement should include national standardization in chemotherapy regimens as well as practice guidelines and protocols to prevent serious AEs.

摘要

家庭化疗(HC)是一种新的治疗选择,可替代基于医院的化疗治疗(IP),并通过便携式静脉输液泵在患者家中进行。HC 减少了医院对住院床位的需求,并降低了输液成本。本研究从社会角度出发,对采用 mFOLFOX6 方案治疗 III 期结肠癌的 HC 和 IP 进行了成本效用和预算影响分析(BIA)。我们进行了一项具有 6 个月时间范围的成本效用分析。模型的参数输入来自曼谷 Ramathibodi 医院诊断为 III 期结肠癌的回顾性队列研究。根据医疗记录确定 HC 和 IP 的资源使用情况。单位直接医疗、家庭保健服务和不良事件(AE)管理成本从标准成本清单中收集。治疗的健康结果以质量调整生命年来衡量。计算了与 AE 相关的不舒适。我们对不确定性结果进行了敏感性分析,并基于社会角度在 1 年时间范围内进行了 BIA。HC 在治疗期间为每位患者节省了 1513.37 美元的成本。因此,假设每年有 526 名患者,使用 HC 可以实现每年 828436 美元的累计成本节省。HC 是 III 期结肠癌治疗的一种比 IP 更具成本效益的策略。我们建议,服务报销应包括化疗方案的国家标准以及实践指南和协议,以预防严重 AE。