• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[根据肾计量评分分析局限性肾实质病变患者腹腔镜肾部分切除术的学习曲线]

[Analysis of the learning curve in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal parenchymal lesions depending on the nephrometric score].

作者信息

Sirota E S, Rapoport L M, Gridin V N, Tsarichenko D G, Kuznetsov I A, Sirota A E, Alyaev Yu G

机构信息

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.

FGBUN Center for Information Technologies in designing RAS, Moscow region, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Urologiia. 2020 Dec(6):11-18.

PMID:33377672
Abstract

AIM

to analyze the learning curve of surgeons while performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal parenchymal lesions by calculating the MIC (negative surgical margin, ischemia, and complications) index depending on tumor complexity according to the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA nephrometric scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

the retrospective study included the results of laparoscopic partial nephrectomies in 320 patients with localized renal parenchymal lesions. The procedures were carried out by four surgeons from the Institute of Urology and Human Reproductive Health of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia (EC-1; ESH-4; EB-7; ME-13) from January 2014 to June 2019. At baseline, all operators had experience of performing at least 30 laparoscopic interventions. In addition to the standard preoperative examination, a 3D virtual planning was carried out using the Amira 3D modeling program. In all cases, the nephrometric assessment of complexity was performed according to the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores. The learning curve was assessed based on the results of operations based on the MIC index. All surgical interventions were divided into eras. In the era, 40 consecutive procedures for each operator were evaluated. Acquired skills were assessed over two eras.

RESULTS

The average age of patients, of which 191 (59.7%) were men, was 54.4+/-11.37 years. The average body mass index was 28.55+/-3.85 kg/m2, the absolute volume of kidney lesions was 26.72+/-43.72 cm3, the average Charlson comorbidity index was 1.46+/-1.29, the average R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA scores were 6.38+/-1.75 and 7.92+/-1.51, respectively, the average duration of procedure was 150.36+/-50.18 min, the average blood loss was 227.94+/-280.22 ml, the average time thermal ischemia was 13.28+/-7.82 min. Postoperative complications were seen in 36 (11.2%) cases, of which grade III and more according to Clavien-Dindo developed in 8 patients (2.5%). A positive surgical margin was found in 4 (1.2%) patients. The overall MIC index was achieved in 243 (75.9%) cases; in era 1 it was seen in 71.9% cases in comparison with 80% in era 2. With the 1st degree of complexity (152 (47.5%) patients), MIC was achieved in 80.9% of cases, compared to 76.6% and 56.8% in patients with 2nd degree of complexity (n=124, 38.8%) and 3rd degree of complexity (n=44, 13.8%), respectively. Rate of MIC achievement in eras 1 and 2 for different surgeons were as following: 65% and 72.5%, 75 and 80%, 87.5 and 85% and 60 and 82.5%, for operator 1, 4, 7 and 13, respectively. Age, tumor complexity, R.E.N.A.L. score and PADUA score were the most significant parameters for determining MIC, identified on the basis of the criterion of equality of group means of discrete analysis.

CONCLUSION

In all surgeons, the MIC index increased with the accumulation of experience in performing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, but was lower with an increased degree of complexity of procedures. The minimum number of laparoscopic partial nephrectomies required to achieve an MIC more or equal 70% should be at least 40.

摘要

目的

通过根据R.E.N.A.L.和PADUA肾计量评分,依据肿瘤复杂性计算MIC(阴性手术切缘、缺血和并发症)指数,分析外科医生在为局限性肾实质病变患者实施腹腔镜部分肾切除术时的学习曲线。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了320例局限性肾实质病变患者的腹腔镜部分肾切除术结果。手术由俄罗斯莫斯科第一国立谢马什克医科大学联邦政府预算高等教育机构泌尿外科与人类生殖健康研究所的四位外科医生(EC - 1;ESH - 4;EB - 7;ME - 13)于2014年1月至2019年6月进行。基线时,所有术者均有至少30次腹腔镜手术经验。除标准术前检查外,使用Amira 3D建模程序进行3D虚拟规划。所有病例均根据R.E.N.A.L.和PADUA评分进行复杂性的肾计量评估。基于MIC指数的手术结果评估学习曲线。所有手术干预分为不同阶段。在每个阶段,评估每位术者连续进行的40例手术。在两个阶段评估所获得的技能。

结果

患者的平均年龄为54.4±11.37岁,其中191例(59.7%)为男性。平均体重指数为28.55±3.85kg/m²,肾脏病变的绝对体积为26.72±43.72cm³,平均Charlson合并症指数为1.46±1.29,平均R.E.N.A.L.和PADUA评分分别为6.38±1.75和7.92±1.51,平均手术时长为150.36±50.18分钟,平均失血量为227.94±280.22毫升,平均热缺血时间为13.28±7.82分钟。36例(11.2%)出现术后并发症,其中根据Clavien - Dindo分级为III级及以上的有8例(2.5%)。4例(1.2%)患者发现手术切缘阳性。243例(75.9%)病例达到总体MIC指数;在第1阶段,71.9%的病例达到该指数,而在第2阶段为80%。对于第1级复杂性(152例(47.5%)患者),80.9%的病例达到MIC,相比之下,第2级复杂性(n = 124,38.8%)和第3级复杂性(n = 44,13.8%)患者的这一比例分别为76.6%和56.8%。不同外科医生在第1阶段和第2阶段达到MIC的比例如下:术者1为65%和72.5%,术者4为75%和80%,术者7为87.5%和85%,术者13为60%和82.5%。年龄、肿瘤复杂性、R.E.N.A.L.评分和PADUA评分是确定MIC的最显著参数,这是基于离散分析组均值相等的标准确定的。

结论

在所有外科医生中,MIC指数随着腹腔镜部分肾切除术经验的积累而增加,但随着手术复杂性程度的增加而降低。要达到MIC≥70%所需的腹腔镜部分肾切除术的最少数量应至少为40例。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of the learning curve in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal parenchymal lesions depending on the nephrometric score].[根据肾计量评分分析局限性肾实质病变患者腹腔镜肾部分切除术的学习曲线]
Urologiia. 2020 Dec(6):11-18.
2
[3D-technologies in planning and navigation for laparoscopic interventions in patients with renal and ureteric stones].[3D技术在肾输尿管结石患者腹腔镜手术规划与导航中的应用]
Urologiia. 2019 Sep(4):9-15.
3
Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics.腹腔镜部分肾切除术的边缘、缺血和并发症发生率:学习曲线和肿瘤解剖特征的影响。
BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1125-32. doi: 10.1111/bju.12317. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
External Validation of the Arterial-Based Complexity Score and First Head-to-Head Comparison With the R.E.N.A.L. and PADUA Scores and C-index.基于动脉的复杂性评分的外部验证及与 R.E.N.A.L. 和 PADUA 评分和 C 指数的首次头对头比较。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Jun;16(3):e595-e604. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
5
Associating the learning curve and tumor anatomical complexity with the margins, ischemia, and complications rate after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.探讨机器人辅助部分肾切除术围手术期边缘、缺血、并发症发生率与学习曲线和肿瘤解剖复杂性的关系。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.042. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort.RENAL 评分在选定队列中对保肾手术结果预测的表现优于 PADUA 评分、C 指数和 DAP 评分。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.176. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
[A comparative analysis of laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy depending on the type of temporary and definite hemostasis].根据临时和确定性止血类型对腹腔镜与后腹腔镜部分肾切除术的比较分析
Urologiia. 2018 Dec(6):95-100.
8
The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy.RENAL、PADUA、C-index、CSA 肾单位切除术系统在预测部分肾切除术后同侧肾功能中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0504-2.
9
[Computer-assisted laparoscopic surgery for renal carcinoma].[计算机辅助腹腔镜肾癌手术]
Urologiia. 2018 Jul(3):30-38.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and preserved renal parenchymal volume.机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术:手术结果及保留肾实质体积的倾向评分匹配比较分析
Int J Urol. 2018 Apr;25(4):359-364. doi: 10.1111/iju.13529. Epub 2018 Feb 4.