Wang Qun-Feng, Liang Chao-Zhao, Zhu Jin-Song, Chen Zhi-Jie, Dai Yu-Hong, Bao Tong
Department of Urology, Anqing Municipal Hospital / Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Auhui Medical Univrsity, Anqing, Anhui 246003, China.
Department of Urolog, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical Univrsity, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2020 Sep;26(9):793-797.
To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of transurethral 180 W front-firing GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
A total of 61 BPH patients underwent 180W front-firing GreenLight laser PVP (n = 30, the PVP group) or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (n = 31, the control group) from March to December 2019. We collected the pre-, intra- and post-operative clinical data and compared them between the two groups of patients.
Operations were successfully completed in all the cases with no blood transfusion or serious complications. Compared with the controls, the patients of the PVP group showed remarkably less intra-operative blood loss ([62.3 ± 15.9] vs [48.8 ± 9.6] ml, P < 0.05), shorter operation time ([75.0 ± 9.9] vs [57.5 ± 19.0] min, P < 0.05), postoperative bladder lavage time ([64.4 ± 10.5] vs [25.2 ± 11.5] h, P < 0.05), catheter-indwelling time ([5.1 ± 0.5] vs [2.5 ± 0.5] d, P < 0.05) and hospitalization time ([7.3 ± 1.7] vs [4.1 ± 0.6] d, P < 0.05), and a lower incidence of postoperative hematuria (12.9% [4/31] vs 0% [0/30], P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences, however, were found between the two groups in the incidence rates of capsular perforation, transurethral resection syndrome (TURS), urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and post-extubation urinary retention. Significant improvement was observed in IPSS, QOL, Qmax and PVR in both groups post-operatively (P < 0.05).
Compared with transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate, 180W front-firing GreenLight laser PVP, with the advantages of less bleeding, shorter catheter-indwelling time and faster recovery, is safer and more effective for the treatment of BPH, with no need for drug withdrawal for those taking anticoagulants, and especially applicable to the elderly and high-risk patients.
评估经尿道180W直射式绿激光前列腺汽化术(PVP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的临床疗效及安全性。
2019年3月至12月,共有61例BPH患者接受了180W直射式绿激光PVP治疗(n = 30,PVP组)或经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(n = 31,对照组)。我们收集了患者术前、术中和术后的临床资料,并对两组患者的资料进行比较。
所有病例手术均成功完成,无输血及严重并发症发生。与对照组相比,PVP组患者术中出血量明显更少([62.3 ± 15.9] vs [48.8 ± 9.6]ml,P < 0.05),手术时间更短([75.0 ± 9.9] vs [57.5 ± 19.0]min,P < 0.05),术后膀胱冲洗时间更短([64.4 ± 10.5] vs [25.2 ± 11.5]h,P < 0.05),留置导尿管时间更短([5.1 ± 0.5] vs [2.5 ± 0.5]d,P < 0.05),住院时间更短([7.3 ± 1.7] vs [4.1 ± 0.6]d,P < 0.05),术后血尿发生率更低(12.9%[4/31] vs 0%[0/30],P < 0.05)。然而,两组在包膜穿孔、经尿道电切综合征(TURS)、尿失禁、尿道狭窄及拔管后尿潴留的发生率方面,差异无统计学意义。两组术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)及残余尿量(PVR)均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。
与经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术相比,180W直射式绿激光PVP治疗BPH更安全、有效,具有出血少、留置导尿管时间短、恢复快等优点,服用抗凝剂的患者无需停药,尤其适用于老年及高危患者。