Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Sociology, Criminal Justice & Criminology, University of Scranton, Scranton, USA.
Glob Public Health. 2021 Apr;16(4):485-501. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1867880. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
The new coronavirus disease, or COVID-19, was first identified in late 2019 and declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. Turkey and Iran have been heavily affected by the outbreak, with over 460,000 and 890,000 cases reported respectively, so far. Even though these two countries have similar political and ideological approaches and are roughly the same size in terms of population density, as well as despite a high number of reported COVID-19 cases, a fast infection spread rate, and mismanagement of the crisis in both countries, Turkey's death toll remained lower when compared to the death toll in Iran. Deploying a comparative case study methodology drawing on an analysis of secondary sources, this study investigates Turkey and Iran's official responses to COVID-19 to further understand authoritarian reactions to large-scale crises and how distinctions between the actions taken by authoritarian regimes might impact crisis management in such contexts.
新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)于 2019 年末首次被确认,并于 2020 年 3 月被世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布为大流行。土耳其和伊朗受疫情影响严重,截至目前,两国分别报告了超过 46 万和 89 万例病例。尽管这两个国家在政治和意识形态方面有相似之处,在人口密度方面大致相同,而且两国都报告了大量 COVID-19 病例、感染传播速度快以及对危机管理不善,但与伊朗相比,土耳其的死亡人数仍然较低。本研究采用比较案例研究方法,利用二手资料分析,研究了土耳其和伊朗对 COVID-19 的官方应对措施,以进一步了解威权主义对大规模危机的反应,以及威权政权采取的行动之间的区别如何影响此类情况下的危机管理。