Begadze Mariam
Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.
Hague J Rule Law. 2022;14(2-3):309-330. doi: 10.1007/s40803-022-00184-8. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
Recognizing the growing tensions between autocrats in the center and opposition-led local governments in Hungary, Poland and Turkey since 2018-2019 local elections, the article contributes to existing literature on illiberal democracies with a subnational portion of illiberal playbook. Tactics identified through the detailed study of the European context and brief review of Latin American experience leaves us with the following categories in the playbook: abuse of (existing) supervisory and accountability mechanisms; generating of financial vulnerability; centralization (outright and indirect) and deconcentration. Each of these categories assemble various means evolving through application and reinterpretation of traditional rules pertaining to local government, as well as crisis-induced innovations. While the Polish account carries the optimism still that antecedent robust guarantees and popular support matter even when illiberals rule the center, the playbook proved successful in Hungary and Turkey. Although certain incrementalism stayed as the most vulnerable actors were the first victims of soon-to-be normalized measures, crisis in Hungary and Poland did stretch the limits to the point that ulterior motives of undermining opposition-led local governments became publicly observable. Reflecting on this phenomenon, in the end, the article poses a theoretical question whether such pretextual instrumentalization of law can itself be judicially manageable, at least in situations when clear political opponents are targeted.
自2018 - 2019年地方选举以来,匈牙利、波兰和土耳其中央的独裁者与反对派领导的地方政府之间的紧张关系日益加剧,本文通过对非自由民主剧本的地方层面内容进行分析,为现有的关于非自由民主的文献做出了贡献。通过对欧洲背景的详细研究以及对拉丁美洲经验的简要回顾所确定的策略,在剧本中可分为以下几类:滥用(现有的)监督和问责机制;制造财政脆弱性;集权(直接和间接)与权力下放。这些类别中的每一类都汇集了各种手段,这些手段通过对与地方政府相关的传统规则的应用和重新解释,以及危机引发的创新而不断演变。虽然波兰的情况仍让人乐观地认为,即使非自由派掌控中央,先前强大的保障措施和民众支持仍然重要,但该剧本在匈牙利和土耳其取得了成功。尽管某些渐进主义仍然存在,因为最脆弱的行为体成为即将常态化措施的首批受害者,但匈牙利和波兰的危机确实将界限推到了这样一个程度,即破坏反对派领导的地方政府的 ulterior motives(原文此处有误,ulterior motives意为不可告人的动机)变得公开可见。最后,反思这一现象,本文提出了一个理论问题,即这种对法律的借口性工具化本身是否至少在针对明确的政治对手的情况下可以通过司法手段加以管控。