Suppr超能文献

一种用于南方家蚊(双翅目:蚊科)监测的高效替代 CDC 孕卵器的方法。

An Efficient Alternative to the CDC Gravid Trap for Southern House Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Surveillance.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA.

St. Tammany Parish Mosquito Abatement, Slidell, LA.

出版信息

J Med Entomol. 2021 May 15;58(3):1322-1330. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa259.

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) is the most prevalent arbovirus found throughout the United States. Surveillance of surface breeding Culex vectors involved in WNV transmission is primarily conducted using CDC Gravid traps. However, anecdotal claims from mosquito abatement districts in Louisiana assert that other trap types may be more suited to WNV surveillance. To test the validity of these assertions, we conducted a series of trapping trials and WNV surveillance over 3 yr to compare the efficacy of multiple trap types. First, we compared the CDC Gravid trap, CO2-baited New Standard Miniature Blacklight traps, and CO2-baited CDC light traps with either an incandescent light, a red light, or no light. We found that the CDC Gravid trap and CO2-baited no-light CDC Light trap collected the most mosquitoes. Second, we conducted additional, long-term trapping and WNV surveillance to compare these two trap types. We found that CO2-baited no-light CDC traps collected more of the local WNV vector, Culex quinquefasciatus (Say, Diptera, Culicidae), and detected WNV with greater sensitivity. Finally, we conducted trapping to compare the physiological states of Cx. quinquefasciatus and diversity of collected mosquitoes. CO2-baited no-light CDC light traps collected more unfed Cx. quinquefasciatus while Gravid traps collected more blooded Cx. quinquefasciatus; both traps collected the same number of gravid Cx. quinquefasciatus. Additionally, we found that CO2-baited no-light CDC light traps collected a larger diversity of mosquito species than Gravid traps.

摘要

西尼罗河病毒(WNV)是美国最常见的虫媒病毒。对参与 WNV 传播的地表繁殖库蚊媒介的监测主要使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)诱蚊产卵器进行。然而,路易斯安那州蚊虫防治区的传闻声称,其他诱捕器类型可能更适合 WNV 监测。为了验证这些说法的有效性,我们进行了一系列为期 3 年的诱捕试验和 WNV 监测,以比较多种诱捕器类型的效果。首先,我们比较了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)诱蚊产卵器、CO2 诱捕的新型标准微型黑光灯诱捕器和 CO2 诱捕的无灯 CDC 诱捕器,后者分别使用白炽灯、红灯或无灯。我们发现,CDC 诱蚊产卵器和 CO2 诱捕无灯 CDC 诱捕器收集的蚊子最多。其次,我们进行了额外的长期诱捕和 WNV 监测,以比较这两种诱捕器类型。我们发现,CO2 诱捕无灯 CDC 诱捕器收集了更多当地的 WNV 传播媒介库蚊(Culex quinquefasciatus (Say, Diptera, Culicidae)),并且具有更高的 WNV 检测灵敏度。最后,我们进行了诱捕以比较 Cx. quinquefasciatus 的生理状态和收集到的蚊子的多样性。CO2 诱捕无灯 CDC 诱捕器收集了更多未进食的库蚊,而 Gravid 诱捕器收集了更多吸血的库蚊;两种诱捕器收集的饱血库蚊数量相同。此外,我们发现 CO2 诱捕无灯 CDC 诱捕器收集的蚊子种类比 Gravid 诱捕器更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验