Suppr超能文献

黏结无托槽矫治器对脱胶疼痛和时间的影响:一项随机分组的临床研究。

Effects of adhesive flash-free brackets on debonding pain and time: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):758-765. doi: 10.2319/030820-162.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets on the level of pain, amount of remnant adhesive, and removal time during the debonding procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients (20 female, 10 male) aged 12 to 18 years undergoing nonextraction fixed orthodontic treatment were included in this study. APC flash-free and conventional ceramic brackets were bonded with a split-mouth study design. Bracket types were randomly allocated to quadrants. During the removal of the brackets, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the level of pain for each tooth. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to determine the amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth surface. Adhesive removal times were calculated per quadrant. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test for comparisons between groups.

RESULTS

Pain scores were generally higher for the conventional group than for the flash-free group. There were no differences in VAS scores across most tooth types during debonding. Overall, ARI results showed more adhesive remnants in the conventional bracket group (P < .001). Except for the right maxillary quadrant, the times required to remove the adhesive were significantly longer for the flash-free brackets than the conventional brackets (P ≤ .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although removal time was slightly longer for the flash-free adhesive than for the conventional adhesive, lower pain scores were generally observed for the flash-free adhesive brackets during the debonding procedure. Both time and pain differences could be considered clinically insignificant.

摘要

目的

评估预涂层(APC)无闪光托槽对去粘接过程中疼痛程度、残余粘接剂量和去除时间的影响。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 30 名年龄在 12 至 18 岁之间接受非拔牙固定正畸治疗的患者(20 名女性,10 名男性)。采用分口研究设计,将 APC 无闪光和传统陶瓷托槽粘结。根据随机分配原则,将托槽类型分配到各个象限。在去除托槽时,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估每颗牙齿的疼痛程度。使用粘接残余指数(ARI)评估牙齿表面残留的粘接剂量。计算每个象限的去除时间。使用 Wilcoxon 检验对组间数据进行比较。

结果

常规组的疼痛评分普遍高于无闪光组。在去粘接过程中,大多数牙齿类型的 VAS 评分没有差异。总体而言,传统托槽组的 ARI 结果显示更多的残余粘接剂(P <.001)。除了右上颌象限外,无闪光托槽去除粘接剂的时间明显长于传统托槽(P ≤.005)。

结论

尽管无闪光粘接剂的去除时间略长,但在去粘接过程中,无闪光粘接剂托槽的疼痛评分通常较低。时间和疼痛的差异可以被认为是临床无意义的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验