Cronin James T, Ii Jerome Goddard, Muthunayake Amila, Shivaji Ratnasingham
Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Department of Mathematics, Auburn University Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 36124, USA.
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Nov 9;17(6):7838-7861. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020399.
Even though mutualistic interactions are ubiquitous in nature, we are still far from making good predictions about the fate of mutualistic communities under threats such as habitat fragmentation and climate change. Fragmentation often causes declines in abundance of a species due to increased susceptibility to edge effects between remnant habitat patches and lower quality "matrix" surrounding these focal patches. It has been argued that ecological communities are replete with trait-mediated indirect effects, and that these effects may sometimes contribute more to the dynamics of a population than direct density-mediated effects, e.g., lowering an organism's fitness through competitive interactions. Although some studies have focused on trait-mediated behavior such as trait-mediated dispersal, in which an organism changes its dispersal patterns due to the presence of another species, they have been mostly limited to predator-prey systems-little is known regarding their effect on other interaction systems such as mutualism. Here, we explore consequences of fragmentation and trait-mediated dispersal on coexistence of a system of two mutualists by employing a model built upon the reaction diffusion framework. To distinguish between trait-mediated dispersal and density-mediated effects, we isolate effects of trait-mediated dispersal on the mutualistic system by excluding any direct density-mediated effects in the model. Our results demonstrate that fragmentation and trait-mediated dispersal can have important impacts on coexistence of mutualists. Specifically, one species can be better able to invade and persist than the other and be crucial to the success of the other species in the patch. Matrix quality degradation can also bring about a complete reversal of the role of which species is supporting the other's persistence in the patch, even as the patch size remains constant. As most mutualistic relationships are identified based on density-mediated effects, such an effect may be easily overlooked.
尽管互利共生相互作用在自然界中普遍存在,但我们距离准确预测互利共生群落面临栖息地破碎化和气候变化等威胁时的命运仍有很大差距。破碎化通常会导致物种数量下降,这是因为残余栖息地斑块与周围低质量“基质”之间的边缘效应增强,使得物种更容易受到影响。有人认为生态群落中充满了性状介导的间接效应,而且这些效应有时对种群动态的影响可能比直接的密度介导效应更大,例如通过竞争相互作用降低生物体的适合度。虽然一些研究聚焦于性状介导的行为,如性状介导的扩散,即生物体由于另一个物种的存在而改变其扩散模式,但这些研究大多局限于捕食者 - 猎物系统,对于它们对互利共生等其他相互作用系统的影响知之甚少。在这里,我们通过构建一个基于反应扩散框架的模型,探讨破碎化和性状介导的扩散对两个互利共生者系统共存的影响。为了区分性状介导的扩散和密度介导的效应,我们在模型中排除任何直接的密度介导效应,从而分离出性状介导的扩散对互利共生系统的影响。我们的结果表明,破碎化和性状介导的扩散会对互利共生者的共存产生重要影响。具体而言,一个物种可能比另一个物种更善于入侵并持续存在,并且对斑块中另一个物种的成功至关重要。即使斑块大小保持不变,基质质量的下降也可能导致在斑块中支持另一个物种持续存在的物种角色完全逆转。由于大多数互利共生关系是基于密度介导的效应来确定的,这样的效应可能很容易被忽视。