Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center , Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
GM Crops Food. 2021 Jan 2;12(1):192-211. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2020.1852065.
Evolution of resistance to genetically modified (Bt) crops in pest populations is a major threat to the sustainability of the technology. Incidents of field resistance that have led to control problems of Bt crops or significantly reduced susceptibility of individual Bt proteins in pyramided plants have increased dramatically across the world, especially in recent years. Analysis of globally published data showed that 61.5% and 60.0% of the cases of resistance with major alleles that allowed homozygous resistant genotypes to survival on Bt crops were functionally non-recessive and did not involve fitness costs, respectively. Dominance levels (Ds) measured on Bt plants ranged from -0.02 to 1.56 with a mean (± sem) of 0.35 ± 0.13 for the 13 cases of single-gene resistance to Bt plants that have been evaluated. Among these, all six cases with field control problems were functionally non-recessive with a mean D of 0.63 ± 0.24, which was significantly greater than the D (0.11 ± 0.07) of the seven cases without field resistance. In addition, index of fitness costs (IFC) of major resistance was calculated for each case based on the fitness of resistant (R'R') and heterozygous (R'S') genotypes on non-Bt plants divided by the fitness of their susceptible (S'S') counterparts. The estimated IFCs for 15 cases of single-gene resistance were similar for R'R' and R'S', and for the cases with and without field resistance; and the values averaged 1.10 ± 0.12 for R'R' and 1.20 ± 0.18 for R'S'. Limited published data suggest that resistance of insects to dual/multiple-gene Bt crops is likely to be more recessive than the related single-gene resistance, but their IFCs are similar. The quantitative analysis of the global data documents that the prevalence of non-recessive resistance has played an essential role in the widespread evolution of resistance to Bt crops, while the lack of fitness costs is apparently not as critical as the non-recessive resistance. The results suggest that planting of 'high dose' traits is an effective method for Bt crop IRM and more comprehensive management strategies that are also effective for functionally non-recessive resistance should be deployed.
抗虫基因改良(Bt)作物在害虫种群中的抗性进化是该技术可持续性的主要威胁。近年来,世界各地田间抗性事件急剧增加,导致Bt 作物的控制问题或显著降低了多基因作物中个别 Bt 蛋白的敏感性。对全球已发表数据的分析表明,61.5%和 60.0%的主要等位基因抗性事件中,允许纯合抗性基因型在 Bt 作物上存活的等位基因是功能非隐性的,且分别不涉及适应成本。在 Bt 植物上测量的显性水平(Ds)范围从-0.02 到 1.56,对于已经评估的 13 个单一基因对 Bt 植物的抗性案例,平均值(± sem)为 0.35±0.13。其中,所有 6 个田间控制问题案例的功能均为非隐性,平均 D 值为 0.63±0.24,明显大于无田间抗性的 7 个案例的 D 值(0.11±0.07)。此外,根据非 Bt 植物上抗性(R'R')和杂合(R'S')基因型的适应性与敏感(S'S')基因型的适应性之比,为每个案例计算了主要抗性的适应成本指数(IFC)。15 个单一基因抗性案例的估计 IFCs 对于 R'R'和 R'S'是相似的,对于有和没有田间抗性的案例也是相似的;R'R'的平均值为 1.10±0.12,R'S'的平均值为 1.20±0.18。有限的已发表数据表明,昆虫对双/多基因 Bt 作物的抗性可能比相关的单一基因抗性更具隐性,但它们的 IFC 相似。对全球数据的定量分析表明,非隐性抗性的普遍性在 Bt 作物抗性的广泛进化中发挥了重要作用,而缺乏适应成本显然不如非隐性抗性重要。研究结果表明,种植“高剂量”特性是 Bt 作物 IRM 的有效方法,还应部署更全面的管理策略,这些策略对功能非隐性抗性也有效。