• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌全胃切除术后现代放疗技术的剂量学比较。

Dosimetric comparison of modern radiotherapy techniques for gastric cancer after total gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Hospital Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Dec;16(Supplement):S133-S137. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_548_18.

DOI:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_548_18
PMID:33380667
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the optimal radiotherapy technique for postoperative irradiation of gastric cancer treated with total gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database of ten patients was used for this study. Three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated therapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans were created for each dataset. The prescription dose was 45 Gy in 25 fractions. Comparative analyses of the target volume coverage and the doses of organs at risk were performed.

RESULTS

HT was significantly provided more homogeneity. The best conformal plans were achieved with VMAT. Both kidneys were better preserved with HT and VMAT. HT significantly lowered the V13 of the left kidney and VMAT significantly lowered V20. However, the mean left kidney doses were not statistically different. The lowest liver V30 was obtained with VMAT but not with statistically different than IMRT and HT. Mean liver doses were statistically inferior with 3D. The worst spinal cord doses were seen with 3D. The integral dose of the body did not differ among the techniques.

CONCLUSION

In comparison of the four techniques, 3D seems to be the most unsuitable method regarding sparing the normal tissues. According to availability, HT and VMAT should be primarily preferred. IMRT can also be used with carefully paying attention to the clinical condition of the patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨全胃切除术后胃癌术后放疗的最佳放疗技术。

材料与方法

本研究使用了 10 例患者的数据库。为每个数据集创建了三维(3D)适形放疗、调强放疗(IMRT)、容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)计划。处方剂量为 45Gy/25 次。对靶区覆盖和危及器官剂量进行了比较分析。

结果

HT 显著提高了均匀性。VMAT 提供了最佳的适形计划。HT 和 VMAT 更好地保护了双侧肾脏。HT 显著降低了左肾的 V13,VMAT 显著降低了 V20。然而,左肾平均剂量无统计学差异。VMAT 获得的肝 V30 最低,但与 IMRT 和 HT 无统计学差异。左肝平均剂量与 3D 相比明显较差。脊髓剂量最差的是 3D。全身积分剂量在各技术之间无差异。

结论

与其他四种技术相比,3D 似乎是保护正常组织最不合适的方法。根据可用性,HT 和 VMAT 应优先考虑。IMRT 也可以使用,但要仔细关注患者的临床状况。

相似文献

1
Dosimetric comparison of modern radiotherapy techniques for gastric cancer after total gastrectomy.胃癌全胃切除术后现代放疗技术的剂量学比较。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Dec;16(Supplement):S133-S137. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_548_18.
2
Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and helical tomotherapy for postoperative gastric cancer patients.三维适形放疗、容积调强弧形放疗和螺旋断层放疗用于胃癌术后患者的剂量学比较
Jpn J Radiol. 2018 Jan;36(1):30-39. doi: 10.1007/s11604-017-0696-x. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
Dosimetric analysis of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy-step and shoot, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy in prostate cancer radiotherapy.前列腺癌放射治疗中三维适形放疗、强度调制放疗分步射野、螺旋断层放疗、容积调强弧形治疗的剂量学分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2021 Jul-Sep;17(4):893-900. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_57_19.
4
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and 3-dimensional conformal therapy for the treatment of T1N0 glottic cancer.螺旋断层放疗、调强放射治疗、容积调强弧形放疗及三维适形放疗治疗T1N0声门癌的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2016;41(4):329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, VMAT, fixed-field IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for stage I-II nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma.螺旋断层放疗、容积调强弧形放疗、固定野调强放疗和三维适形放疗用于Ⅰ-Ⅱ期鼻腔自然杀伤T细胞淋巴瘤的剂量学比较
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0812-1.
6
Double-arc volumetric modulated therapy improves dose distribution compared to static gantry IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy for adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer.与静态机架调强放射治疗和三维适形放射治疗相比,双弧容积调强放疗改善了胃癌辅助治疗的剂量分布。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 May 19;10:114. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0420-x.
7
Novel hybrid treatment planning approach for irradiation a pediatric craniospinal axis.用于小儿颅脊柱轴照射的新型混合治疗计划方法。
Med Dosim. 2024;49(2):93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
8
Pancreatic cancer planning: Complex conformal vs modulated therapies.胰腺癌治疗计划:复杂适形放疗与调强放疗
Med Dosim. 2016 Summer;41(2):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.10.002. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
Single-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (sVMAT) as adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer: dosimetric comparisons with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).单弧容积调强弧形放疗(sVMAT)作为胃癌辅助治疗:与三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)和调强放疗(IMRT)的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2013 Winter;38(4):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage.左侧乳房切线强度调制放疗(t-IMRT)与切线容积旋转调强放疗(t-VMAT)比较:继发性癌症诱导风险与最佳靶区覆盖之间的权衡。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep 2;14(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1363-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Tumor Cell Responses to Different Radiotherapy Techniques: Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Helical Tomotherapy (HT).肿瘤细胞对不同放疗技术的反应比较:三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)、容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)。
Biology (Basel). 2025 May 10;14(5):529. doi: 10.3390/biology14050529.
2
Long-term Outcome After Helical Tomotherapy Following Breast Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.保乳术后导管原位癌行螺旋断层放疗的长期疗效。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241264847. doi: 10.1177/15330338241264847.
3
Assessment of Field-in-Field, 3-Field, and 4-Field Treatment Planning Methods for Radiotherapy of Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer.
胃食管交界癌放疗的野中野、三野和四野治疗计划方法评估
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022 Oct 1;12(5):439-454. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2206-1500. eCollection 2022 Oct.