Christiano Anthony V, Goch Abraham M, Burke Christopher J, Leucht Philipp, Konda Sanjit R, Egol Kenneth A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 E. 98th Street, Box 1188, New York, NY 10029-6504 USA.
Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY USA.
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):216-220. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09680-4. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
Orthopedic surgeons use radiographs to determine degrees of fracture healing, guide progression of clinical care, and assist in determining weight bearing and removal of immobilization. However, no gold standard exists to determine the progression of healing of humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a scale comparable to the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial (RUST) fractures applied to non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures can increase interobserver reliability in determining fracture healing.
A retrospective review was undertaken by three orthopedic traumatologists and one musculoskeletal radiologist, who evaluated 50 sets of anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, presented at random, of non-operatively treated humeral shaft fractures at various stages of healing from 17 patients. The radiographs were scored using a modified RUST scale called the Radiographic Humerus Union Measurement (RHUM). Observers were blinded to the time from injury. After a 4-week washout period, observers again scored the same radiographs. Observers classified each fracture as either healed or not healed based on the combination of radiographs. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the RHUM were determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interobserver reliability of determining a healed fracture was calculated using Cohen's kappa (κ) statistics. A receiver operator characteristic curve was conducted to determine the RHUM score predictive of a fracture being considered healed.
ICC demonstrated almost perfect interobserver reliability (ICC, 0.838; ICC 95% CI, 0.765 to 0.896) and intraobserver reliability (ICC range, 0.822 to 0.948) of the RHUM. κ demonstrated substantial agreement between observers in considering a fracture healed (κ = 0.647). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that a RHUM of 10 or higher is an excellent predictor of the observer considering the fracture healed (area under the ROC curve = 0.946, specificity = 0.957, 95% CI specificity, 0.916 to 0.979).
This cortical scoring system has excellent interobserver reliability in humeral shaft fractures treated non-operatively. Consistent with previous cortical scoring systems, a RHUM score of 10 or above can be considered radiographically healed.
骨科医生使用X线片来确定骨折愈合程度,指导临床治疗进程,并协助确定负重情况及去除固定装置。然而,对于非手术治疗的肱骨干骨折,目前尚无确定其愈合进程的金标准。
本研究的目的是确定一种类似于改良胫骨放射学愈合评分(RUST)的评分系统应用于非手术治疗的肱骨干骨折时,是否能提高观察者之间在判断骨折愈合方面的可靠性。
三位骨科创伤专家和一位肌肉骨骼放射科医生进行了一项回顾性研究,他们对17例患者非手术治疗的肱骨干骨折在不同愈合阶段随机呈现的50组前后位和侧位X线片进行评估。使用一种名为肱骨干放射学愈合测量(RHUM)的改良RUST量表对X线片进行评分。观察者对受伤时间不知情。在4周的洗脱期后,观察者再次对相同的X线片进行评分。观察者根据X线片的综合情况将每个骨折分类为愈合或未愈合。使用组内相关系数(ICC)确定RHUM的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。使用Cohen's kappa(κ)统计量计算判断骨折愈合的观察者间可靠性。绘制受试者工作特征曲线以确定预测骨折被视为愈合的RHUM评分。
ICC显示RHUM具有几乎完美的观察者间可靠性(ICC,0.838;ICC 95%可信区间,0.765至0.896)和观察者内可靠性(ICC范围,0.822至0.948)。κ显示观察者在判断骨折愈合方面有实质性一致性(κ = 0.647)。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线表明,RHUM为10或更高是观察者判断骨折愈合的良好预测指标(ROC曲线下面积 = 0.946,特异性 = 0.957,95%可信区间特异性,0.916至0.979)。
这种皮质评分系统在非手术治疗的肱骨干骨折中具有出色的观察者间可靠性。与先前的皮质评分系统一致,RHUM评分为10或以上可被视为放射学愈合。