Suppr超能文献

行为分析师在面对假设性构念时的行为准则:对埃卡德和拉塔尔(2020年)的评论

Rules of Conduct for Behavior Analysts in the Presence of Hypothetical Constructs: A Commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020).

作者信息

Machado Armando, Guilhardi Paulo, Caetano Marcelo S, Silva Francisco J

机构信息

University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Beacon ABA Services, Inc., Leominster, MA USA.

出版信息

Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Nov 23;43(4):791-802. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Eckard and Lattal (2020) summarized the behavioristic view of hypothetical constructs and theories, and then, in a novel and timely manner, applied this view to a critique of internal clock models of temporal control. In our three-part commentary, we aim to contribute to the authors' discussion by first expanding upon their view of the positive contributions afforded by constructs and theories. We then refine and question their view of the perils of reifying constructs and assigning them causal properties. Finally, we suggest to behavior analysts four rules of conduct for dealing with mediational theories: tolerate constructs proposed with sufficient reason; consider them seriously, both empirically and conceptually; develop alternative, behavior-analytic models with overlapping empirical domains; and contrast the various models. Through variation and selection, behavioral science will evolve.

摘要

埃卡德和拉塔尔(2020年)总结了关于假设性构念和理论的行为主义观点,然后以新颖且及时的方式将这一观点应用于对时间控制的生物钟模型的批判。在我们这篇分为三个部分的评论中,我们旨在通过首先扩展他们关于构念和理论所带来的积极贡献的观点,来推动作者的讨论。然后,我们对他们关于将构念具体化并赋予其因果属性的危险性的观点进行完善并提出质疑。最后,我们向行为分析师们提出处理中介理论的四条行为准则:容忍有充分理由提出的构念;从实证和概念两方面认真考虑它们;开发具有重叠实证领域的替代性行为分析模型;以及对比各种模型。通过变异和选择,行为科学将会发展。

相似文献

1
Rules of Conduct for Behavior Analysts in the Presence of Hypothetical Constructs: A Commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020).
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Nov 23;43(4):791-802. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00272-w. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Correction to: Rules of Conduct for Behavior Analysts in the Presence of Hypothetical Constructs: A Commentary on Eckard and Lattal (2020).
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Dec 10;44(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00275-7. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Internal-Clock Models and Misguided Views of Mechanistic Explanations: A Reply to Eckard & Lattal (2020).
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Sep 11;43(4):779-790. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00268-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
The Internal Clock: A Manifestation of a Misguided Mechanistic View of Causation?
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jan 3;43(1):5-19. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
The Real Problem with Hypothetical Constructs.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Sep 13;44(4):683-704. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
A commentary on Kendler (2014).
Psychol Med. 2015 Apr;45(6):1119-20. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002438. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
8
Construct overlap in resource theories of memory aging. Commentary.
Gerontology. 1999 Nov-Dec;45(6):348-50. doi: 10.1159/000022119.

引用本文的文献

1
The Real Problem with Hypothetical Constructs.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Sep 13;44(4):683-704. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00311-0. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
The Internal Clock: A Manifestation of a Misguided Mechanistic View of Causation?
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jan 3;43(1):5-19. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Animal timing: a synthetic approach.
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):707-32. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-0977-2. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
Learning in the temporal bisection task: Relative or absolute?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):67-81. doi: 10.1037/xan0000089.
4
A clock not wound runs down.
Behav Processes. 1999 Apr;45(1-3):129-39. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00014-5.
5
The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research.
Behav Processes. 1998 Dec;44(2):101-17. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(98)00043-6.
6
Properties of the internal clock: first- and second-order principles of subjective time.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:743-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
7
Learning to Time: a perspective.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Nov;92(3):423-58. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-423.
8
Toward a richer view of the scientific method. The role of conceptual analysis.
Am Psychol. 2007 Oct;62(7):671-81. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.671.
9
THE METAPHOR IN SCIENCE.
Science. 1912 Aug 30;36(922):263-9. doi: 10.1126/science.36.922.263.
10
Internal states: Necessary but not sufficient.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):469-72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-469.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验