Karasu Bugra, Kiray Gulunay, Eris Erdem, Perente Irfan, Cenk Celebi Ali Riza
University of Health Sciences, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Ophthalmology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
North Clin Istanb. 2020 Jul 23;7(6):579-584. doi: 10.14744/nci.2020.06888. eCollection 2020.
To evaluate the results and recurrence rates of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) in Turkish Cohort.
Medical records were reviewed in all patients who underwent surgery for PANDO between January 2010 and September 2014 in a tertiary university hospital retrospectively. The patients were followed up on the first day, first month, third month and sixth month postoperatively. Lacrimal drainage system and recurrence rates were recorded.
This study was conducted in 81 patients, 27 of whom were men (33.3%) and 54 were women (66.7%). The mean follow-up time was 30.13±16.42 months (range 6-62 months). The mean age was 50.51±12.47 years (range 16 to 77 years). External DCR was used in 44 (66.7%) of the cases and endonasal DCR was used in 37 (45.7%) of the cases. Surgical results of DCR were divided into three groups based on the integrity and openness of the lacrimal drainage pathway in all PANDO patients. Operation success rates of these data revealed that 45 (55.6%) cases were recorded as successful, 20 (24.7%) of the cases were accepted as partially successful and 16 (19.8%) of the cases were deemed as unsuccessful. Based on these data, surgical success rates were found in 38 (86.4%) patients in external DCR and 27 (73%) patients in endonasal DCR. Surgical failure rates were six (13.6%) in external DCR and 10 (27%) in endonasal DCR. There was no statistically significant difference between success rates and recurrences in both groups (p>0.05).
Endoscopic DCR produced simple, minimally invasive and preferable results compared to external DCR in the Turkish population. Although the success of external DCR is higher and the recurrence is lower than endoscopic DCR, with the outcomes of this study, endoscopic DCR can be tried as the first choice to protect the patient from major surgery and anesthesia in PANDO.
评估土耳其队列中,接受外路和鼻内镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术(DCR)治疗原发性后天性鼻泪管阻塞(PANDO)患者的手术效果及复发率。
回顾性分析2010年1月至2014年9月在一家三级大学医院接受PANDO手术的所有患者的病历。术后第1天、第1个月、第3个月和第6个月对患者进行随访。记录泪道引流系统及复发率。
本研究共纳入81例患者,其中男性27例(33.3%),女性54例(66.7%)。平均随访时间为30.13±16.42个月(范围6 - 62个月)。平均年龄为50.51±12.47岁(范围16至77岁)。44例(66.7%)采用外路DCR,37例(45.7%)采用鼻内镜下DCR。根据所有PANDO患者泪道引流途径的完整性和通畅性,将DCR手术结果分为三组。这些数据的手术成功率显示,45例(55.6%)记录为成功,20例(24.7%)被认为部分成功,16例(19.8%)被视为失败。基于这些数据,外路DCR手术成功率为38例(86.4%),鼻内镜下DCR手术成功率为27例(73%)。外路DCR手术失败率为6例(13.6%),鼻内镜下DCR手术失败率为10例(27%)。两组成功率和复发率之间无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。
在土耳其人群中,与外路DCR相比,鼻内镜下DCR操作简单、创伤小,效果更佳。尽管外路DCR的成功率更高,复发率低于鼻内镜下DCR,但基于本研究结果,在PANDO患者中,可尝试将鼻内镜下DCR作为首选,以使患者避免接受大手术及麻醉。