Guinemer Camille, Boeker Martin, Weiss Bjoern, Fuerstenau Daniel, Balzer Felix, Poncette Akira-Sebastian
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 31;9(12):e19695. doi: 10.2196/19695.
Telemedicine has been deployed to address issues in intensive care delivery, as well as to improve outcome and quality of care. Implementation of this technology has been characterized by high variability. Tele-intensive care unit (ICU) interventions involve the combination of multiple technological and organizational components, as well as interconnections of key stakeholders inside the hospital organization. The extensive literature on the benefits of tele-ICUs has been characterized as heterogeneous. On one hand, positive clinical and economical outcomes have been shown in multiple studies. On the other hand, no tangible benefits could be detected in several cases. This could be due to the diverse forms of organizations and the fact that tele-ICU interventions are complex to evaluate. The implementation context of tele-ICUs has been shown to play an important role in the success of the technology. The benefits derived from tele-ICUs depend on the organization where it is deployed and how the telemedicine systems are applied. There is therefore value in analyzing the benefits of tele-ICUs in relation to the characteristics of the organization where it is deployed. To date, research on the topic has not provided a comprehensive overview of literature taking both the technology setup and implementation context into account.
We present a protocol for a scoping review of the literature on telemedicine in the ICU and its benefits in intensive care. The purpose of this review is to map out evidence about telemedicine in critical care in light of the implementation context. This review could represent a valuable contribution to support the development of tele-ICU technologies and offer perspectives on possible configurations, based on the implementation context and use case.
We have followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist and the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The scoping review and subsequent systematic review will be completed by spring 2021.
The preliminary search has been conducted. After removing all duplicates, we found 2530 results. The review can now be advanced to the next steps of the methodology, including literature database queries with appropriate keywords, retrieval of the results in a reference management tool, and screening of titles and abstracts.
The results of the search indicate that there is sufficient literature to complete the scoping review. Upon completion, the scoping review will provide a map of existing evidence on tele-ICU systems given the implementation context. Findings of this research could be used by researchers, clinicians, and implementation teams as they determine the appropriate setup of new or existing tele-ICU systems. The need for future research contributions and systematic reviews will be identified.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19695.
远程医疗已被用于解决重症监护中的问题,并改善护理结果和质量。这项技术的实施具有高度变异性。远程重症监护病房(ICU)干预涉及多种技术和组织要素的结合,以及医院组织内部关键利益相关者的相互联系。关于远程ICU益处的大量文献具有异质性。一方面,多项研究显示了积极的临床和经济结果。另一方面,在一些案例中未发现明显益处。这可能是由于组织形式多样,以及远程ICU干预难以评估。事实证明,远程ICU的实施环境对该技术的成功起着重要作用。远程ICU带来的益处取决于其部署的组织以及远程医疗系统的应用方式。因此,分析远程ICU相对于其部署组织的特征所带来的益处具有重要意义。迄今为止,关于该主题的研究尚未全面概述同时考虑技术设置和实施环境的文献。
我们提出了一项关于ICU远程医疗及其在重症监护中益处的文献综述方案。本综述的目的是根据实施环境梳理重症监护中远程医疗的证据。本综述可为支持远程ICU技术的发展做出有价值的贡献,并根据实施环境和用例提供可能配置的观点。
我们遵循了系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述(PRISMA-ScR)清单以及乔安娜·布里格斯研究所范围综述方法的建议。范围综述及后续的系统评价将于2021年春季完成。
已进行初步检索。去除所有重复项后,我们得到2530条结果。现在可以将综述推进到方法的下一步,包括使用适当关键词进行文献数据库查询、在参考管理工具中检索结果以及筛选标题和摘要。
检索结果表明有足够的文献来完成范围综述。完成后,范围综述将根据实施环境提供远程ICU系统现有证据的图谱。研究人员、临床医生和实施团队在确定新的或现有的远程ICU系统的适当设置时可使用本研究结果。将确定未来研究贡献和系统评价的需求。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/19695。