Rehabilitation Hospital affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Technology, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;49(2):450-458. doi: 10.1177/0363546520976635. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
Little data exist in the literature regarding second-look arthroscopic outcomes after pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root.
To (1) assess the functional, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and second-look arthroscopic outcomes after pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root; (2) determine which demographic and clinical factors influenced healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root; and (3) compare outcomes between different meniscal healing status groups.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
A total of 31 patients underwent pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using patient-reported scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] scores). Lateral meniscal extrusion, cartilage degeneration of the lateral compartment, and healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root were assessed via MRI. The healing status was also assessed using second-look arthroscopic surgery, and the patients were divided into different healing status groups.
The postoperative patient-reported scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative values ( = .001). Lateral meniscal extrusion was reduced significantly from 3.37 ± 0.82 mm preoperatively to 0.63 ± 0.80 mm at final follow-up ( = .001). The grade of cartilage degeneration of the lateral compartment progressed from 0.69 ± 0.67 preoperatively to 0.95 ± 0.83 at final follow-up ( = .213). MRI scans showed complete healing in 28 patients (90.3%) and partial healing in 3 patients (9.7%). Second-look arthroscopic surgery showed stable healing in 18 of 23 patients (78.3%) and lax healing in 5 of 23 patients (21.7%). Patients with stable healing had significantly higher Lysholm and IKDC scores, more reduction of meniscal extrusion, and less progression of cartilage degeneration than did patients with lax healing ( < .05). Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was found to significantly positively influence healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root ( = .047).
Pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root yielded significantly improved patient-reported scores, reduced meniscal extrusion, and a satisfactory healing rate at final follow-up. Patients with stable healing had significantly better functional and MRI outcomes than did patients with lax healing.
关于后外侧半月板根部撕脱伤经皮撬拨修复后的关节镜二次探查结果,文献中数据较少。
(1)评估后外侧半月板根部撕脱伤经皮撬拨修复后的功能、磁共振成像(MRI)和关节镜二次探查结果;(2)确定哪些人口统计学和临床因素影响修复后的后外侧半月板根愈合;(3)比较不同半月板愈合状态组的结果。
病例系列;证据水平,4 级。
共 31 例患者接受后外侧半月板根部撕脱伤经皮撬拨修复,并进行了至少 2 年的随访。采用患者报告评分(Lysholm、Tegner 和国际膝关节文献委员会 [IKDC] 评分)评估功能结果。通过 MRI 评估外侧半月板外突、外侧间室软骨退变和修复后的后外侧半月板根愈合情况。还通过关节镜二次探查手术评估愈合情况,并将患者分为不同的愈合状态组。
与术前相比,术后患者报告评分显著改善( =.001)。外侧半月板外突从术前的 3.37 ± 0.82mm 显著减少至末次随访时的 0.63 ± 0.80mm( =.001)。外侧间室软骨退变程度从术前的 0.69 ± 0.67 增加到末次随访时的 0.95 ± 0.83( =.213)。MRI 扫描显示 28 例(90.3%)完全愈合,3 例(9.7%)部分愈合。关节镜二次探查显示 23 例中有 18 例(78.3%)愈合稳定,23 例中有 5 例(21.7%)愈合松弛。与愈合松弛的患者相比,愈合稳定的患者 Lysholm 和 IKDC 评分显著更高,外侧半月板外突减少更多,软骨退变进展更少( <.05)。同时行前交叉韧带重建与修复后外侧半月板根愈合显著正相关( =.047)。
后外侧半月板根部撕脱伤经皮撬拨修复后,患者报告评分显著改善,外侧半月板外突减少,末次随访时愈合率满意。愈合稳定的患者功能和 MRI 结果明显优于愈合松弛的患者。