Oyewole-Said Damilola, Konduri Vanaja, Vazquez-Perez Jonathan, Weldon Scott A, Levitt Jonathan M, Decker William K
Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Immunol. 2020 Dec 15;11:608024. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.608024. eCollection 2020.
The immune response consists of a finely-tuned program, the activation of which must be coupled with inhibitory mechanisms whenever initiated. This ensures tight control of beneficial anti-pathogen and anti-tumor responses while preserving tissue integrity, promoting tissue repair, and safeguarding against autoimmunity. A cogent example of this binary response is in the mobilization of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signaling in regulating the strength and type of a T-cell response. Of particular importance is the costimulatory molecule CD28 which is countered by CTLA-4. While the role of CD28 in the immune response has been thoroughly elucidated, many aspects of CTLA-4 biology remain controversial. The expression of CD28 is largely constrained to constitutive expression in T-cells and as such, teasing out its function has been somewhat simplified by a limited and specific expression profile. The expression of CTLA-4, on the other hand, while reported predominantly in T-cells, has also been described on a diverse repertoire of cells within both lymphoid and myeloid lineages as well as on the surface of tumors. Nonetheless, the function of CTLA-4 has been mostly described within the context of T-cell biology. The focus on T-cell biology may be a direct result of the high degree of amino acid sequence homology and the co-expression pattern of CD28 and CTLA-4, which initially led to the discovery of CTLA-4 as a counter receptor to CD28 (for which a T-cell-activating role had already been described). Furthermore, observations of the outsized role of CTLA-4 in T-mediated immune suppression and the striking phenotype of T-cell hyperproliferation and resultant disease in CTLA-4 mice contribute to an appropriate T-cell-centric focus in the study of CTLA-4. Complete elucidation of CTLA-4 biology, however, may require a more nuanced understanding of its role in a context other than that of T-cells. This makes particular sense in light of the remarkable, yet limited utility of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in the treatment of cancers and of CTLA-4-Ig in autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis. By fully deducing the biology of CTLA-4-regulated immune homeostasis, bottlenecks that hinder the widespread applicability of CTLA-4-based immunotherapies can be resolved.
免疫反应由一个精细调节的程序组成,该程序一旦启动,其激活必须与抑制机制相结合。这确保了在保持组织完整性、促进组织修复和防止自身免疫的同时,对有益的抗病原体和抗肿瘤反应进行严格控制。这种二元反应的一个有说服力的例子是在调节T细胞反应的强度和类型时共刺激和共抑制信号的动员。特别重要的是共刺激分子CD28,它被CTLA-4所拮抗。虽然CD28在免疫反应中的作用已被充分阐明,但CTLA-4生物学的许多方面仍存在争议。CD28的表达在很大程度上局限于T细胞中的组成性表达,因此,由于其有限且特定的表达谱,梳理其功能在一定程度上得到了简化。另一方面,CTLA-4的表达虽然主要在T细胞中报道,但也在淋巴系和髓系谱系的多种细胞以及肿瘤表面被描述。尽管如此,CTLA-4的功能大多是在T细胞生物学的背景下描述的。对T细胞生物学的关注可能是由于CD28和CTLA-4高度的氨基酸序列同源性以及共表达模式,这最初导致CTLA-4被发现是CD28的反向受体(此前已经描述了CD28在T细胞激活中的作用)。此外,观察到CTLA-4在T介导的免疫抑制中的巨大作用以及CTLA-4基因敲除小鼠中T细胞过度增殖和由此导致的疾病的显著表型,促成了在CTLA-4研究中以T细胞为中心的适当关注。然而,要完全阐明CTLA-4生物学,可能需要对其在T细胞以外的背景中的作用有更细致入微的理解。鉴于抗CTLA-4抗体在癌症治疗中的显著但有限的效用以及CTLA-4-Ig在类风湿性关节炎等自身免疫性疾病中的效用,这一点尤其有意义。通过全面推断CTLA-4调节的免疫稳态生物学,可以解决阻碍基于CTLA-4的免疫疗法广泛应用的瓶颈问题。