Nishizaki Hitomi, Morimoto Yoshinari, Hayashi Megumi, Iida Takatoshi
Department of Critical Care Medicine and Dentistry, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Japan.
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.027. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients with severe dementia require intravenous sedation during dental treatment. However, few reports have compared the outcomes of intravenous sedation management among sedatives. Intravenous sedation in the elderly with severe dementia undergoing dental treatment was evaluated retrospectively.
Patients' characteristics and type of dementia were obtained from medical records. Midazolam (MID), dexmedetomidine (DEX), and propofol (PRO) were administered as sedatives. The systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), SpO, bispectral index (BIS) values and complications were evaluated.
Nineteen patients with severe dementia who underwent 62 instances of sedation were included. There was no difference in patient background between sedatives. The sedation time and permission time to return home were significantly longer in DEX than in MID or PRO group. Half the usual dose in MID and lower limits of the routine dose was effective in DEX and PRO. HR was significantly lower in DEX group. There were 3 cases with airway obstruction requiring nasopharyngeal airway and 4 cases of apnea when MID was administered. Two cases of Cheyne-Stokes-like respiration when MID or DEX was administered. SpO <94% was found in 22 cases (35%) irrespective of the sedative. A patient with dementia with Lewy bodies had experienced hallucinations during the recovery period after sedation when MID or DEX was administered. The BIS value of ≤80 was noted during complications.
Intravenous sedation for dental treatment in the elderly with severe dementia, needs a dose titration. All sedatives had respiratory-related complications which mandate close monitoring.
背景/目的:重度痴呆患者在牙科治疗期间需要静脉镇静。然而,很少有报告比较不同镇静剂在静脉镇静管理方面的效果。对接受牙科治疗的重度痴呆老年人的静脉镇静情况进行了回顾性评估。
从病历中获取患者的特征和痴呆类型。使用咪达唑仑(MID)、右美托咪定(DEX)和丙泊酚(PRO)作为镇静剂。评估收缩压(SBP)、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SpO)、脑电双频指数(BIS)值及并发症。
纳入19例接受62次镇静的重度痴呆患者。不同镇静剂组患者背景无差异。DEX组的镇静时间和回家许可时间显著长于MID组或PRO组。MID使用常用剂量的一半,DEX和PRO使用常规剂量下限有效。DEX组HR显著更低。使用MID时,有3例气道阻塞需要放置鼻咽气道,4例呼吸暂停。使用MID或DEX时,有2例出现潮式呼吸样呼吸。无论使用何种镇静剂,22例(35%)患者的SpO<94%。1例路易体痴呆患者在使用MID或DEX镇静后的恢复期出现幻觉。并发症发生期间记录到BIS值≤80。
重度痴呆老年人牙科治疗的静脉镇静需要剂量滴定。所有镇静剂均有与呼吸相关的并发症,需要密切监测。