Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.
J Dent. 2021 Feb;105:103569. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103569. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
To analyze retrospectively the clinical performance and survival of lithium disilicate inlays, partial crowns and crowns placed by undergraduate students.
250 lithium disilicate posterior restorations (IPS™Emax Press) were evaluated. Mean service time was 6.6 years (79 months) with a maximum observation time of 8.5 years (102 months). Clinical performance was assessed using FDI Criteria. Descriptive statistics were used to display the distribution of the criteria. Success and survival of the restorations were calculated with the Kaplan Meier method. A Cox regression analysis was performed to detect influencing parameters for the survival or the success of the restorations.
Survival and success rates of lithium disilicate indirect restorations were calculated at 6.6 years with 96.3 % and 93.8 %, respectively. After 8.5 years the survival rate was calculated with 94 % and the success rate with 83.8 %. 10 out of 250 restorations (4%) failed, while the main reasons for failure were fracture of material, debonding/loss of restoration, endodontic complications as well as recurrence of caries. A Cox regression analysis failed to show a correlation between restoration failure and the experience level of the students, an existing root canal treatment, type of tooth, bruxism or the use of rubber dam.
Lithium disilicate indirect posterior restorations demonstrate a high success and survival rate after a mean service of 6.6 years when placed by undergraduate students with different levels of experience. Co-factors influencing the survival or success rate of these restorations could not be identified.
Lithium disilicate restorations show a good clinical performance up to 8.5 years when prepared by undergraduate students.
回顾性分析本科生制作的锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体、部分冠和全冠的临床性能和存活率。
对 250 例锂硅玻璃陶瓷后牙修复体(IPS™Emax Press)进行评估。平均随访时间为 6.6 年(79 个月),最长观察时间为 8.5 年(102 个月)。采用 FDI 标准评估临床性能。采用描述性统计展示标准的分布。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算修复体的成功率和存活率。采用 Cox 回归分析检测影响修复体存活率和成功率的参数。
锂硅玻璃陶瓷间接修复体的存活率和成功率分别在 6.6 年时计算为 96.3%和 93.8%,8.5 年后的存活率为 94%,成功率为 83.8%。250 个修复体中有 10 个(4%)失败,失败的主要原因是材料断裂、修复体脱落/丢失、牙髓并发症以及龋齿复发。Cox 回归分析未能显示修复失败与学生的经验水平、是否存在根管治疗、牙齿类型、磨牙症或使用橡皮障之间存在相关性。
在有不同经验水平的本科生制作的后牙锂硅玻璃陶瓷间接修复体,平均随访 6.6 年后,其成功率和存活率均较高。无法确定影响这些修复体存活率或成功率的共同因素。
锂硅玻璃陶瓷修复体在有本科生预备的情况下,8.5 年内临床性能良好。