Lee Dong Hoon, Park Jong Hyeok, Lee Jung Jae, Lee Jong Beom, Lee Ho Jin, Kim Il Sup, Hur Jung Woo, Hong Jae Taek
1Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon.
2Department of Neurosurgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon.
Neurosurg Focus. 2021 Jan;50(1):E5. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.FOCUS20770.
The authors sought to evaluate the usefulness of indocyanine green (ICG) angiography and Doppler sonography for monitoring the vertebral artery (VA) during craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery and compare the incidence of VA injury (VAI) between the groups with and without the monitoring of VA using ICG angiography and Doppler sonography.
In total, 344 consecutive patients enrolled who underwent CVJ surgery. Surgery was performed without intraoperative VA monitoring tools in 262 cases (control group) and with VA monitoring tools in 82 cases (monitoring group). The authors compared the incidence of VAI between groups. The procedure times of ICG angiography, change of VA flow velocity measured by Doppler sonography, and complication were investigated.
There were 4 VAI cases in the control group, and the incidence of VAI was 1.5%. Meanwhile, there were no VAI cases in the monitoring group. The procedure time of ICG angiography was less than 5 minutes (mean [± SD] 4.6 ± 2.1 minutes) and VA flow velocity was 11.2 ± 4.5 cm/sec. There were several cases in which the surgical method had to be changed depending on the VA monitoring. The combined use of ICG angiography and Doppler sonography was useful not only to monitor VA patency but also to assess the quality of blood flow during CVJ surgery, especially in the high-risk group of patients.
The combined use of ICG angiography and Doppler sonography enables real-time intraoperative monitoring of the VA by detecting blood flow and flow velocity. As the arteries get closer, they provide auditory and visual feedback to the surgeon. This real-time image guidance could be a useful tool, especially for high-risk patients and inexperienced surgeons, to avoid iatrogenic VAI during any CVJ surgery.
作者旨在评估吲哚菁绿(ICG)血管造影和多普勒超声在颅颈交界区(CVJ)手术中监测椎动脉(VA)的效用,并比较使用ICG血管造影和多普勒超声监测VA与未监测VA的两组之间椎动脉损伤(VAI)的发生率。
总共纳入344例连续接受CVJ手术的患者。262例患者在无术中VA监测工具的情况下进行手术(对照组),82例患者在有VA监测工具的情况下进行手术(监测组)。作者比较了两组之间VAI的发生率。研究了ICG血管造影的操作时间、多普勒超声测量的VA流速变化以及并发症情况。
对照组中有4例VAI病例,VAI发生率为1.5%。同时,监测组中无VAI病例。ICG血管造影的操作时间少于5分钟(平均[±标准差]4.6±2.1分钟),VA流速为11.2±4.5厘米/秒。有几例手术方法不得不根据VA监测情况进行改变。ICG血管造影和多普勒超声的联合使用不仅有助于监测VA通畅情况,还能评估CVJ手术期间的血流质量,尤其是在高危患者组中。
ICG血管造影和多普勒超声的联合使用能够通过检测血流和流速在术中实时监测VA。随着动脉距离变近,它们为外科医生提供听觉和视觉反馈。这种实时图像引导可能是一种有用的工具,特别是对于高危患者和经验不足的外科医生,可避免在任何CVJ手术中发生医源性VAI。