Brent Mikkel Bo, Brüel Annemarie, Thomsen Jesper Skovhus
Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Biomedicine, Health, Aarhus University, Wilhelm Meyers Allé 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 May;108(5):561-575. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00799-9. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
Several different animal models are used to study disuse-induced bone loss. This systematic review aims to give a comprehensive overview of the animal models of disuse-induced bone loss and provide a detailed narrative synthesis of each unique animal model.
PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for animal models of disuse from inception to November 30, 2019. In addition, Google Scholar and personal file archives were searched for relevant publications not indexed in PubMed or Embase. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts for full-text inclusion. Data were extracted using a predefined extraction scheme to ensure standardization.
1964 titles and abstracts were screened of which 653 full-text articles were included. The most common animal species used to model disuse were rats (59%) and mice (30%). Males (53%) where used in the majority of the studies and genetically modified animals accounted for 7%. Twelve different methods to induce disuse were identified. The most frequently used methods were hindlimb unloading (44%), neurectomy (15%), bandages and orthoses (15%), and botulinum toxin (9%). The median time of disuse was 21 days (quartiles: 14 days, 36 days) and the median number of animals per group subjected to disuse was 10 (quartiles: 7, 14). Random group allocation was reported in 43% of the studies. Fewer than 5% of the studies justified the number of animals per group by a sample size calculation to ensure adequate statistical power.
Multiple animal models of disuse-induced bone loss exist, and several species of animals have successfully been studied. The complexity of disuse-induced bone loss warrants rigid research study designs. This systematic review emphasized the need for standardization of animal disuse research and reporting.
使用多种不同的动物模型来研究废用性骨质流失。本系统评价旨在全面概述废用性骨质流失的动物模型,并对每个独特的动物模型进行详细的叙述性综合分析。
对PubMed和Embase进行系统检索,以查找从创刊至2019年11月30日的废用动物模型。此外,还在谷歌学术和个人文件存档中搜索未被PubMed或Embase索引的相关出版物。两名评审员独立评审标题和摘要以确定是否纳入全文。使用预定义的提取方案提取数据以确保标准化。
筛选了1964篇标题和摘要,其中653篇全文文章被纳入。用于模拟废用的最常见动物物种是大鼠(59%)和小鼠(30%)。大多数研究使用雄性动物(53%),转基因动物占7%。确定了12种不同的诱导废用的方法。最常用的方法是后肢卸载(44%)、神经切除术(15%)、绷带和矫形器(15%)以及肉毒杆菌毒素(9%)。废用的中位时间为21天(四分位数:14天,36天),每组接受废用的动物中位数为10只(四分位数:7只,14只)。43%的研究报告了随机分组。不到5%的研究通过样本量计算来证明每组动物数量的合理性,以确保有足够的统计效力。
存在多种废用性骨质流失的动物模型,并且已经成功研究了几种动物物种。废用性骨质流失的复杂性需要严格的研究设计。本系统评价强调了动物废用研究和报告标准化的必要性。