Shaish Hiram, Ma Hong Y, Ahmed Firas S
Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jun;46(6):2498-2504. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02902-y. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
To study the association between gallbladder dimensions and acute cholecystitis and to define a sensitive cutoff for excluding the disease.
456 consecutive patients with an abdominal ultrasound performed for right upper quadrant pain, from 1/2019 to 4/2019, were retrospectively collected. Length and width of the gallbladder were measured by a blinded radiology fellow. Patient charts were examined for prospective sonographic findings, clinical data, and pathology from subsequent cholecystectomy or at least 1 month of follow-up with symptom resolution. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to define the association of gallbladder dimensions and other sonographic and clinical variables with acute cholecystitis. Optimal and sensitive cutoffs of gallbladder widths were defined. The determined sensitive cutoff was validated with a separate cohort of 501 consecutive patients.
319 patients (median age 48 ± 19 years) including 11%, 19%, and 70% with acute, chronic, and no cholecystitis were included in the experimental cohort, respectively, and 298 patients (median age 50 ± 19 years) including 10%, 12%, and 79% with acute, chronic, and no cholecystitis were included in the validation cohort, respectively. Of all sonographic findings and clinical data, gallbladder width produced the best univariate ROC curve with an AUC of 0.91 (Odds ratio 5.1, 95% CI 3.1-8.5, p < 0.001). 2.2 cm was the gallbladder width cutoff below which there were no cases of acute cholecystitis in the experimental cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using sonographic findings only produced an ROC curve with an AUC of 0.94. Applying the 2.2 cm cutoff in the validation cohort resulted in 100% sensitivity.
Lack of gallbladder distention, defined as a width less than 2.2 cm, has potential to serve as a highly sensitive sign for exclusion of acute cholecystitis, regardless of additional sonographic findings and clinical data.
研究胆囊尺寸与急性胆囊炎之间的关联,并确定排除该疾病的敏感临界值。
回顾性收集了2019年1月至2019年4月期间因右上腹疼痛接受腹部超声检查的456例连续患者。由一名不知情的放射科住院医师测量胆囊的长度和宽度。检查患者病历,以获取前瞻性超声检查结果、临床数据以及后续胆囊切除术的病理结果或至少1个月随访且症状缓解后的情况。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定胆囊尺寸以及其他超声检查和临床变量与急性胆囊炎之间的关联。确定胆囊宽度的最佳和敏感临界值。使用501例连续患者的独立队列对确定的敏感临界值进行验证。
实验队列包括319例患者(中位年龄48±19岁),其中分别有11%、19%和70%患有急性、慢性和无胆囊炎;验证队列包括298例患者(中位年龄50±19岁),其中分别有10%、12%和79%患有急性、慢性和无胆囊炎。在所有超声检查结果和临床数据中,胆囊宽度产生了最佳的单变量ROC曲线,AUC为0.91(比值比5.1,95%CI 3.1 - 8.5,p < 0.001)。2.2 cm是胆囊宽度临界值,低于该值实验队列中无急性胆囊炎病例。仅使用超声检查结果进行的多变量逻辑回归分析产生了一条AUC为0.94的ROC曲线。在验证队列中应用2.2 cm临界值时,敏感性为100%。
胆囊扩张不足(定义为宽度小于2.2 cm)有可能作为排除急性胆囊炎的高度敏感指标,无论其他超声检查结果和临床数据如何。