Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Pharmaceutical Products, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Curr Drug Deliv. 2021;18(7):1022-1026. doi: 10.2174/1567201818666210101112256.
The most common treatment for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (POAG) is the daily use of eye drops. Sustained-release drug delivery systems have been developed to improve patient adherence by achieving prolonged therapeutic drug concentrations in ocular target tissues while limiting systemic exposure. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost inserts with bimatoprost eye drops in patients with POAG and Ocular Hypertension (OH).
We include OH and POAG patients aged between 40 and 75 years-old. Both OH and POAG patients had intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 and ≤30 mmHg at 9:00 am without glaucoma medication and normal biomicroscopy. Five normal patients with IOP≤14 mmHg constitute the control group. A chitosan-based insert of bimatoprost was placed at the upper conjunctival fornix of the right eye. In the left eye, patients used one drop of LumiganTM daily at 10:00 pm. For statistical analysis, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Student t-test, and paired t-test is used.
Sixteen POAG and 13 OH patients with a mean age of 61 years were assessed. In both eyes, IOP reduction was similar during three weeks of follow-up (19.5±2.2 mmHg and 16.9±3.1 mmHg), insert, and eye drop, respectively; P=0.165). The percentage of IOP reduction in the third week was 30% for insert and 35% for eye drops (P=0.165). No intolerance or discomfort with the insert was reported. Among the research participants, 58% preferred the use of the insert while 25% preferred eye drops, and 17% reported no preference.
Bimatoprost-loaded inserts showed similar efficacy to daily bimatoprost eye drops during three weeks of follow up, without major side effects. This might suggest a possible change in the daily therapeutic regimen for the treatment of POAG and OH.
原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的最常见治疗方法是每天使用眼药水。已经开发了缓释药物递送系统,通过在眼部靶组织中实现延长的治疗药物浓度来提高患者的顺应性,同时限制全身暴露。本研究的目的是比较贝美前列素植入物与贝美前列素滴眼液在 POAG 和高眼压症(OH)患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们纳入了年龄在 40 岁至 75 岁之间的 OH 和 POAG 患者。OH 和 POAG 患者在上午 9 点时眼压(IOP)均大于 21mmHg 且≤30mmHg,并且没有使用青光眼药物,且眼前节正常。5 名 IOP≤14mmHg 的正常患者构成对照组。将贝美前列素的壳聚糖基植入物置于右眼上结膜穹窿。在左眼,患者每天晚上 10 点使用一滴 LumiganTM。对于统计分析,使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)、学生 t 检验和配对 t 检验。
评估了 16 名 POAG 和 13 名 OH 患者,平均年龄为 61 岁。在三周的随访期间,双眼的眼压降低相似(植入物和滴眼剂分别为 19.5±2.2mmHg 和 16.9±3.1mmHg);P=0.165)。第三周的眼压降低百分比为植入物 30%,滴眼剂 35%(P=0.165)。未报告对植入物有不耐受或不适。在研究参与者中,58%更喜欢使用植入物,25%更喜欢滴眼剂,17%表示没有偏好。
在三周的随访期间,贝美前列素负载的植入物显示出与每日贝美前列素滴眼剂相似的疗效,没有主要的副作用。这可能表明 POAG 和 OH 治疗的日常治疗方案可能会发生变化。