Suppr超能文献

跨专业协作对慢性病管理的影响:来自临床试验和荟萃分析的系统评价结果。

Impact of interprofessional collaboration on chronic disease management: Findings from a systematic review of clinical trial and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2021 Feb;125(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

Improvement of chronic disease management demands effective collaborative relationships between health and social-care which is achieved through teamwork. Interprofessional Education (IPE) and Interprofessional Collaboration (IPC) are recognized as essential for the delivery of effective and efficient healthcare. Although IPC and IPE are key components of primary care, evidence of studies evaluating how an IPE intervention prior to IPC improved chronic patient outcomes remains scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of IPC interventions on the management of chronic patients compared to usual care. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) on IPC interventions on chronicity management and their impact on clinical and process outcomes was conducted. Of the 11,128 papers initially retrieved, 23 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses results showed the reduction of systolic blood pressure (Mean Difference (MD) -3.70; 95 % CI -7.39, -0.01), glycosylated hemoglobin (MD -0.20; 95 % CI -0.47, -0.07), LDL cholesterol (MD -5.74; 95 % CI -9.34, -2.14), diastolic blood pressure (MD -1.95; 95 % CI -3.18, -0.72), days of hospitalization (MD -2.22; 95 % CI -4.30, -0.140). A number of positive findings for outcomes related to IPC were found reflecting an improvement of quality of care and an enhancement in the delivery of patient-centered and coordinated care. Moreover, the need for a purposeful systemic approach linking interprofessional education with interprofessional collaboration and patient health and wellbeing is necessary.

摘要

改善慢性病管理需要卫生和社会保健之间建立有效的协作关系,这可以通过团队合作来实现。跨专业教育(IPE)和跨专业协作(IPC)被认为是提供有效和高效医疗保健的必要条件。尽管 IPC 和 IPE 是初级保健的关键组成部分,但仍缺乏评估 IPC 之前的 IPE 干预如何改善慢性病患者结局的证据。本研究旨在评估 IPC 干预对慢性病患者管理的影响与常规护理相比。对 IPC 干预对慢性病管理及其对临床和流程结果的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。在最初检索到的 11128 篇论文中,有 23 篇符合纳入标准。荟萃分析结果表明,收缩压(平均差值(MD)-3.70;95%置信区间(CI)-7.39,-0.01)、糖化血红蛋白(MD-0.20;95%CI-0.47,-0.07)、LDL 胆固醇(MD-5.74;95%CI-9.34,-2.14)、舒张压(MD-1.95;95%CI-3.18,-0.72)、住院天数(MD-2.22;95%CI-4.30,-0.140)均有所降低。还发现了一些与 IPC 相关的积极结果,反映了护理质量的提高以及以患者为中心和协调护理的提供得到了加强。此外,需要有一种有目的的系统方法,将跨专业教育与跨专业协作以及患者的健康和福祉联系起来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验