Misso Dylan, Zhen Emily, Kelly John, Collopy Dermot, Clark Gavin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St John of God Midland Public Hospital, 1 Clayton Street, Midland, WA, 6056, Australia.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Perth Children's Hospital, 15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):813-819. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01173-5. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
Robot-assisted arthroplasty (RAA) is increasingly practised in orthopaedic surgery. The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of all published primary research into RAA and to apply the Progressive Scholarly Acceptance (PSA) model to evaluate its acceptance as an orthopaedic surgical technique. A literature search was performed that included all peer-reviewed, primary, English language publications on RAA from its introduction in 1992 up to 2019. RAA was defined as robot-assisted hip or knee arthroplasty. A bibliometric analysis was performed to categorise articles by type of study and level of evidence. Studies were also categorised as initial investigations (II) or refining studies (RS). A PSA analysis was performed, with the end-point being defined as the point in time when the number of RS exceeded the number of II. Of the 199 studies originating from 19 countries and 101 institutions, only 16 (8.04%) were randomised-controlled trials. Fifty-one percent of studies had been published since 2015. Using PSA analysis, 161 (80.9%) studies were categorised as II and 38 (19.1%) were categorised as RS. This demonstrates that RAA has not yet reached the point of scholarly acceptance. Scholarly acceptance of RAA as an orthopaedic surgical technique has yet to be reached. However, there has been an exponential increase in the number of publications on RAA in the last 5 years, reflecting renewed interest this technique. We predict that, for the next 5 years, RAA will remain in the experimental phase due to the rapid development of new technology in this field.
机器人辅助关节置换术(RAA)在骨科手术中的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是对所有已发表的关于RAA的原发性研究进行文献计量分析,并应用渐进式学术接受度(PSA)模型来评估其作为一种骨科手术技术的接受程度。进行了一项文献检索,纳入了从1992年RAA首次引入至2019年期间所有经过同行评审的、原发性的、英文的关于RAA的出版物。RAA被定义为机器人辅助髋关节或膝关节置换术。进行了文献计量分析,以按研究类型和证据水平对文章进行分类。研究还被分为初始研究(II)或改进研究(RS)。进行了PSA分析,终点定义为RS数量超过II数量的时间点。在来自19个国家和101个机构的199项研究中,只有16项(8.04%)是随机对照试验。51%的研究自2015年以来发表。使用PSA分析,161项(80.9%)研究被归类为II,38项(19.1%)被归类为RS。这表明RAA尚未达到学术接受的程度。RAA作为一种骨科手术技术尚未获得学术认可。然而,在过去5年中,关于RAA的出版物数量呈指数级增长,反映出对该技术的重新关注。我们预测,在未来5年里,由于该领域新技术的快速发展 RAA将仍处于实验阶段。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016-11
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019-2-12
Bone Joint J. 2020-4
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023-9-22
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016-1
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-8-29
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022
Surg Technol Int. 2017-7-25