• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术显示出对软组织的保护作用。

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection.

作者信息

Khlopas Anton, Chughtai Morad, Hampp Emily L, Scholl Laura Y, Prieto Michael, Chang Ta-Cheng, Abbasi Abdullah, Bhowmik-Stoker Manoshi, Otto Jason, Jacofsky David J, Mont Michael A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Research Department, Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:441-446.

PMID:28696495
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures have demonstrated clinical success, occasionally intraoperative complications can occur. Collateral or posterior cruciate ligament injury, instability, extensor mechanism disruption, and tibiofemoral or patellofemoral dislocation are among a few of the intraoperatively driven adverse events prevalently ranked by The Knee Society. Robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) provides a surgeon the ability to three-dimensionally plan a TKA and use intraoperative visual, auditory, and tactile feedback to ensure that only the desired bone cuts are made. The potential benefits of soft tissue protection in these surgeries need to be further evaluated. The purpose of this cadaver study was to assess the a) integrity of various knee soft tissue structures (medial collateral ligament [MCL], lateral collateral ligament [LCL], posterior cruciate ligament [PCL], and the patellar ligament), as well as b) the need for tibial subluxation and patellar eversion during RATKA procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six cadaver knees were prepared using RATKA by a surgeon with no prior clinical robotic experience. These were compared to seven manually performed cases as a control. The mean Kellgren-Lawrence score was 2.8 (range, 0 to 4) in RATKA and 2.6 (range, 1 to 4) in the manual cohort. The presence of soft tissue damage was assessed by having an experienced surgeon perform a visual evaluation and palpation of the PCL, MCL, LCL, and the patellar ligament after the procedures. In addition, leg pose and retraction were documented during all bone resections. The amount of tibial subluxation and patellar eversion was recorded for each case.

RESULTS

For all RATKA-assisted cases, there was no visible evidence of disruption of any of the ligaments. All RATKA cases were left with a bone island on the tibial plateau, which protected the PCL. Tibial subluxation and patella eversion were not required for visualization in any RATKA cases. In two of the seven MTKA cases, there was slight disruption noted of the PCL, although this did not lead to any apparent change in the functional integrity of the ligament. All MTKA cases required tibial subluxation and patellar revision to achieve optimal visualization.

DISCUSSION

Several aspects of soft tissue protection were noted during the study. During bone resections, the tibia in RATKA procedures did not require subluxation, which may reduce ligament stretching or decrease complication rates. Potential patient benefits for short-term recovery and decreased morbidity to reduce operative complications should be studied in a clinical setting. Since RATKA uses a stereotactic boundary to constrain the sawblade, which is generated based on the implant size, shape, and plan, and does not have the ability to track the patient's soft tissue structures, standard retraction techniques during cutting are recommended. Therefore, the retractor placement and potential for soft tissue protection needs to be further investigated. RATKA has the potential to increase soft tissue protection when compared to manual TKA.

摘要

引言

虽然全膝关节置换术(TKA)已取得临床成功,但术中偶尔也会出现并发症。膝关节侧副韧带或后交叉韧带损伤、不稳定、伸肌机制破坏以及胫股或髌股关节脱位是膝关节协会普遍列出的一些术中不良事件。机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术(RATKA)使外科医生能够对TKA进行三维规划,并利用术中视觉、听觉和触觉反馈,确保只进行所需的骨切割。这些手术中软组织保护的潜在益处需要进一步评估。本尸体研究的目的是评估:a)各种膝关节软组织结构(内侧副韧带[MCL]、外侧副韧带[LCL]、后交叉韧带[PCL]和髌韧带)的完整性,以及b)RATKA手术过程中胫骨半脱位和髌骨外翻的必要性。

材料与方法

一名此前无机器人临床经验的外科医生使用RATKA对六个尸体膝关节进行操作。将其与七个手动操作病例作为对照。RATKA组的平均Kellgren-Lawrence评分为2.8(范围为0至4),手动操作组为2.6(范围为1至4)。术后由经验丰富的外科医生对PCL、MCL、LCL和髌韧带进行视觉评估和触诊,以评估软组织损伤情况。此外,在所有骨切除过程中记录腿部姿势和牵开情况。记录每个病例的胫骨半脱位和髌骨外翻程度。

结果

在所有RATKA辅助病例中,未发现任何韧带断裂的明显迹象。所有RATKA病例在胫骨平台上都留下了一个骨岛,保护了PCL。在任何RATKA病例中,可视化都不需要胫骨半脱位和髌骨外翻。在七个手动全膝关节置换术(MTKA)病例中的两个病例中,PCL有轻微断裂,尽管这并未导致韧带功能完整性出现任何明显变化。所有MTKA病例都需要胫骨半脱位和髌骨复位以实现最佳可视化。

讨论

研究中注意到了软组织保护的几个方面。在骨切除过程中,RATKA手术中的胫骨不需要半脱位,这可能会减少韧带拉伸或降低并发症发生率。短期恢复和降低发病率以减少手术并发症对患者的潜在益处应在临床环境中进行研究。由于RATKA使用基于植入物尺寸、形状和规划生成的立体定向边界来约束锯片,且无法跟踪患者的软组织结构,因此建议在切割过程中采用标准的牵开技术。因此,牵开器的放置和软组织保护的潜力需要进一步研究。与手动TKA相比,RATKA有增加软组织保护的潜力。

相似文献

1
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection.机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术显示出对软组织的保护作用。
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:441-446.
2
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques.与手动技术相比,机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术在规划方面显示出更高的准确性和精确性。
J Knee Surg. 2019 Mar;32(3):239-250. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641729. Epub 2018 May 1.
3
Less iatrogenic soft-tissue damage utilizing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty when compared with a manual approach: A blinded assessment.与手动手术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术造成的医源性软组织损伤更少:一项盲法评估。
Bone Joint Res. 2019 Nov 2;8(10):495-501. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0129.R1. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Arthrofibrosis in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Investigation Into How Robotic Assistance May Contribute to a Tight Knee.机器人全膝关节置换术后的关节纤维化:探究机器人辅助如何导致膝关节紧绷。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 May 2;7(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-23-00025. eCollection 2023 May 1.
5
Adoption of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Decreased Use of Articular Constraint and Manipulation under Anesthesia Compared to a Manual Approach.与手动方法相比,采用机械臂辅助全膝关节置换术与减少使用关节约束和麻醉下操作有关。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Jul;35(8):849-857. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721123. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
6
Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与提高准确性和患者报告的结果相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2677-2695. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
7
How Does Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology Influence Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Placement for Surgeons in Fellowship Training?机器人辅助技术如何影响 fellowship 培训医师的全膝关节置换术植入物放置?
J Knee Surg. 2022 Jan;35(2):198-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716983. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2002-2006. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.060. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Presence of Extra-Articular Deformity.存在关节外畸形情况下的机器人辅助全膝关节置换术
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:497-502.
10
Opioid Use in Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison to Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty.机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术中阿片类药物的使用:与传统手动全膝关节置换术的比较
Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov 28;37:280-289.

引用本文的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Marker for Postoperative Stress in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为机器人辅助全膝关节置换术后应激反应的标志物
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 23;31:e947906. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947906.
2
Modified Macroscopic Soft Tissue Injury (Modified MASTI) Classification for Bone and Soft Tissue Integrity in Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.用于保留交叉韧带全膝关节置换术中骨与软组织完整性的改良宏观软组织损伤(Modified MASTI)分类
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Feb 21;59(3):414-425. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01343-3. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
A new parameter in the era of robotic total knee arthroplasty: Coronal alignment at 90° of flexion impacts clinical outcomes.
机器人全膝关节置换时代的一个新参数:屈膝90°时的冠状面力线影响临床结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2581-2591. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12648. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
4
A comparative study of early postoperative pain: robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.术后早期疼痛的比较研究:机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术
Int Orthop. 2025 Jun;49(6):1359-1364. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06451-1. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
5
[Three-dimensional individual joint reconstruction through the Mako robotic arm-assisted surgical technique : Possibilities and limitations of the surgical technique].[通过Mako机器人手臂辅助手术技术进行三维个体关节重建:手术技术的可能性与局限性]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;53(11):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04554-y. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
6
Variability in Alignment and Bone Resections in Robotically Balanced Total Knee Arthroplasties.机器人平衡全膝关节置换术中对线和骨切除的变异性。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Aug 19;11(8):845. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11080845.
7
Predictive Accuracy Analysis of a Novel Robotic-Assisted System for Total Knee Arthroplasty:A Prospective Observational Study.一种新型机器人辅助全膝关节置换系统的预测准确性分析:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Aug 8;20:473-482. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S468598. eCollection 2024.
8
Trends and epidemiology in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Reduced complications and shorter hospital stays.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的趋势和流行病学:并发症减少,住院时间缩短。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Dec;32(12):3281-3288. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12353. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
9
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty reduces postoperative complications and length of stay without increased cost compared to navigation-guided techniques: A national analysis.与导航引导技术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术可降低术后并发症和缩短住院时间,且成本不会增加:一项全国性分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jan;33(1):336-342. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12348. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
10
Robotics in total knee replacement: Current use and future implications.全膝关节置换术中的机器人技术:当前应用及未来影响。
World J Orthop. 2024 Jun 18;15(6):489-494. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.489.