Suppr超能文献

基于毒力基因谱、荚膜基因型、序列型和抗菌药物耐药模式比较成人侵袭性和非侵袭性酿脓链球菌分离株。

Comparison between Invasive and Non-Invasive Streptococcus agalactiae Isolates from Human Adults, Based on Virulence Gene Profiles, Capsular Genotypes, Sequence Types, and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.

机构信息

Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Graduate School of Infection Control Sciences & Ōmura Satoshi Memorial Institute, Kitasato University, Japan.

Division of Clinical Laboratory, Byotai-Seiri Laboratory, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 21;74(4):316-324. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.761. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

Abstract

This study assessed whether invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) isolates were similar to non-invasive isolates from adult patients. Invasive and non-invasive GBS isolates were collected from three hospitals and two laboratory centers between January 2015 and October 2019. The isolates were identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and amplification of the GBS-specific dltS gene. The virulence gene profiles, capsular genotypes, sequence types (STs)/clonal complexes (CCs), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes/genotypes were determined for the 72 invasive and 50 non-invasive isolates that were comparatively analyzed. We observed a significantly decreased rate of rib detection in the invasive isolates compared to that in the non-invasive isolates (77.8% vs. 92.0%, P < 0.05). Additionally, we found significant differences in the prevalence of CC1 (23.6% vs. 46.0%, P < 0.05) and CC26 (12.5% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.05) between invasive and non-invasive populations. However, there were no significant differences in the comparative data of the virulence gene profiles, capsular genotypes, other STs/CCs, and AMR phenotypes/genotypes between the two populations. These findings suggest that both invasive and non-invasive isolates share similar features in terms of virulence gene profile, capsular genotype, ST/CC, and AMR genotype/phenotype (except for the rates of rib detection and CC1/CC26 prevalence).

摘要

本研究评估了侵袭性 B 群链球菌(GBS)分离株是否与成人患者的非侵袭性分离株相似。侵袭性和非侵袭性 GBS 分离株于 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月期间从三家医院和两个实验室中心收集。通过 16S rRNA 扩增子测序和 GBS 特异性 dltS 基因扩增来鉴定分离株。对 72 株侵袭性和 50 株非侵袭性分离株进行了比较分析,确定了毒力基因谱、荚膜基因型、序列型(ST)/克隆复合体(CC)以及抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)表型/基因型。与非侵袭性分离株相比,侵袭性分离株的核糖检测率显著降低(77.8%比 92.0%,P<0.05)。此外,我们发现侵袭性和非侵袭性人群中 CC1(23.6%比 46.0%,P<0.05)和 CC26(12.5%比 2.0%,P<0.05)的流行率存在显著差异。然而,两组之间毒力基因谱、荚膜基因型、其他 ST/CC 以及 AMR 表型/基因型的比较数据没有显著差异。这些发现表明,侵袭性和非侵袭性分离株在毒力基因谱、荚膜基因型、ST/CC 和 AMR 基因型/表型方面具有相似的特征(除了核糖检测率和 CC1/CC26 流行率)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验