Malmqvist Erik, Munthe Christian
University of Gothenburg.
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Sep 2;13(3):275-287. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa020. eCollection 2020 Nov.
Antibiotic resistance is widely recognized as a major threat to public health and healthcare systems worldwide. Recent research suggests that pollution from antibiotics manufacturing is an important driver of resistance development. Using Sweden as an example, this article considers how industrial antibiotic pollution might be addressed by public actors who are in a position to influence the distribution and use of antibiotics in high-income countries with publicly funded health systems. We identify a number of opportunities for these actors to incentivize industry to increase sustainability in antibiotics production. However, we also show that each alternative would create tensions with other significant policy goals, necessitating trade-offs. Since justifiable trade-offs require ethical consideration, we identify and explore the main underlying normative issues, namely, the weighing of local versus global health interests, the weighing of present versus future health interests, and the role of individualistic constraints on the pursuit of collective goals. Based on this analysis, we conclude that the actors have weighty principled reasons for prioritizing the goal of addressing pollution, but that translating this stance into concrete policy requires accommodating significant pragmatic challenges.
抗生素耐药性被广泛认为是对全球公共卫生和医疗保健系统的重大威胁。最近的研究表明,抗生素生产造成的污染是耐药性发展的一个重要驱动因素。本文以瑞典为例,探讨了在拥有公共资助卫生系统的高收入国家,有能力影响抗生素分发和使用的公共行为体应如何应对工业抗生素污染问题。我们确定了这些行为体激励行业提高抗生素生产可持续性的一些机会。然而,我们也表明,每种选择都会与其他重要政策目标产生冲突,因此需要进行权衡。由于合理的权衡需要进行伦理考量,我们确定并探讨了主要的潜在规范性问题,即权衡本地与全球健康利益、权衡当前与未来健康利益,以及个人主义限制对追求集体目标的作用。基于这一分析,我们得出结论,行为体有充分的原则性理由将解决污染问题的目标置于优先地位,但将这一立场转化为具体政策需要应对重大的实际挑战。