Labriola Bernadette
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health Systems, Durham, North Carolina.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019 Sep-Oct;10(7):692-700. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2019.10.7.5. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
KS is a 33-year-old Caucasian married woman who works full time as an accountant and has one daughter who is 2 years old. She enjoys reading and exercising in her spare time. She initially presented in July 2015 at the age of 31 years with a 1-cm breast mass in the left inner breast, which prompted a mammogram to be obtained. The mammogram revealed diffuse and occasionally grouped left breast calcifications. Additionally, there was focal edema at the site of the mass. A follow-up mammogram was recommended to document stability in 6 months, which demonstrated an interval increase in number and size of segmental pleomorphic calcifications in the lower inner breast spanning 6 cm in size. A stereotactic core needle biopsy was completed and revealed high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that was estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive.
KS underwent genetic testing due to her young age at diagnosis of noninvasive breast cancer. She was tested with the breast/ovarian cancer panel, which was negative for mutation.She preceded to bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy with left sentinel node biopsy and immediate implant reconstruction in February 2016. The operative pathology revealed 3.3 cm of high-grade DCIS. The surgical margins were negative (less than 1 mm posteriorly and less than 2 mm anteriorly). There was 1 sentinel node and 2 nonsentinel nodes negative for malignancy. The right breast was negative for cancer and both retro areolar margins were negative.KS did well during the ensuing routine follow-up every 6 to 12 months in surgical oncology at an academic medical center. She was not recommended to take adjuvant endocrine therapy given the benefit of bilateral mastectomy.In 2017, at a routine oncology follow-up visit, she expressed a desire to have more children. After a negative clinical exam, she and her husband were advised that future contraception may be pursued.
PREGNANCY-ASSOCIATED BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS: KS was in her usual state of good health when she noticed a left breast mass in the inferior reconstructed breast in June 2017. She presented to the nurse practitioner (NP) in the surgical oncology clinic for evaluation. At that time, she was 17 weeks pregnant and being seen in the same facility for high-risk obstetrics and gynecology care. KS had no other concerning symptoms for recurrent cancer, and her pregnancy had been progressing smoothly.The surgical oncology NP noted a 1-cm firm superficial mass in the breast at 6 o'clock. She had no other bilateral breast findings or adenopathy. Upon review of systems, she denied new persistent headache, shortness of breath, abdominal pain, weight loss, night sweats, or fatigue.Due to her pregnancy and the superficial presentation of the breast mass, a left breast ultrasound was ordered. It revealed an 8-mm irregular hypoechoic mass 7 cm from the nipple at the 6 o'clock position in the reconstructed breast.A diagnostic workup ensued with a left breast ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. KS was given a diagnosis of clinical stage T1b, N0, grade 2 invasive micropapillary carcinoma: ER positive (Allred 6), PR positive (Allred 8), HER2/, immunohistochemistry 3+, and fluorescence in situ hybridization amplified.After discussion of this recurrent cancer diagnosis, her team opted for a bilateral diagnostic mammogram (with abdominal shielding) and bilateral axillary and breast ultrasound to evaluate the contralateral breast and lymph nodes. There was no adenopathy, a small amount of accessory breast tissue in the right axillary tail region, and a biopsy clip was noted in the left inferior breast at 6 o'clock. The new cancer was not seen on mammogram, likely due to the proximity to the implant.
KS是一名33岁的已婚白人女性,全职担任会计工作,有一个2岁的女儿。她在业余时间喜欢阅读和锻炼。她最初于2015年7月就诊,当时31岁,左乳内侧有一个1厘米的乳房肿块,因此进行了乳房X光检查。乳房X光检查显示左乳有弥漫性且偶尔成组的钙化。此外,肿块部位有局灶性水肿。建议进行后续乳房X光检查以记录6个月内的稳定性,结果显示乳房下内侧节段性多形性钙化的数量和大小在间隔期有所增加,范围达6厘米。完成了立体定向核心针穿刺活检,结果显示为高级别导管原位癌(DCIS),雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)均为阳性。
由于KS诊断为非浸润性乳腺癌时年龄较轻,因此进行了基因检测。她接受了乳腺癌/卵巢癌检测组的检测,结果为无突变。2016年2月,她接受了双侧保留乳头乳房切除术及左侧前哨淋巴结活检,并立即进行了植入物重建。手术病理显示有3.厘米的高级别DCIS。手术切缘为阴性(后方小于1毫米,前方小于2毫米)。有1个前哨淋巴结和2个非前哨淋巴结无恶性肿瘤。右乳无癌,乳晕后切缘均为阴性。在一家学术医疗中心的外科肿瘤学部门,KS在随后每6至12个月的常规随访中情况良好。鉴于双侧乳房切除术的益处,不建议她接受辅助内分泌治疗。2017年,在一次常规肿瘤学随访中,她表示希望再要孩子。经过阴性临床检查后,建议她和丈夫考虑未来的避孕措施。
2017年6月,KS身体健康如常,她注意到重建乳房下方的左乳有一个肿块。她前往外科肿瘤学诊所找执业护士(NP)进行评估。当时,她怀孕17周,正在同一家机构接受高危妇产科护理。KS没有其他与癌症复发相关的症状,她的妊娠进展顺利。外科肿瘤学NP在乳房6点钟位置发现一个1厘米的坚实浅表肿块。她双侧乳房没有其他异常发现,也没有腺病。在系统回顾中,她否认有新的持续性头痛、呼吸急促、腹痛、体重减轻、盗汗或疲劳。由于她怀孕且乳房肿块为浅表性,因此进行了左乳超声检查。结果显示在重建乳房6点钟位置距乳头7厘米处有一个8毫米的不规则低回声肿块。随后进行了诊断性检查,包括左乳超声引导下的核心针穿刺活检。KS被诊断为临床分期T1b、N0、2级浸润性微乳头癌:ER阳性(Allred 6),PR阳性(Allred 8),HER2/,免疫组化3+,荧光原位杂交显示扩增。在讨论了这一复发性癌症诊断后,她的医疗团队选择进行双侧诊断性乳房X光检查(采用腹部屏蔽)以及双侧腋窝和乳房超声检查,以评估对侧乳房和淋巴结。没有腺病,右腋窝尾部区域有少量副乳腺组织,左乳下方6点钟位置有一个活检夹。乳房X光检查未发现新的癌症,可能是因为其靠近植入物。