Kiely Bridget, Croke Aisling, O'Shea Eamon, Connolly Deirdre, Smith Susan M
Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland.
HRB Open Res. 2020 Nov 17;2:21. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12936.2. eCollection 2019.
The use of link workers for social prescribing and health and social care coordination is increasing, but there is insufficient data to demonstrate their effectiveness or for whom they work best. Multimorbidity is increasing in prevalence and affects those living in deprived areas ten years earlier than affluent areas. This systematic review aims to examine the evidence for the effectiveness and costs of link workers in improving health outcomes. We will also look for evidence for the use of link workers specifically for people living with multimorbidity and in deprived areas. Databases of published and grey literature will be searched for randomised and non-randomised controlled trials examining use of link workers based in primary care for community dwelling adults compared to usual care. Primary outcomes will be health related quality of life and mental health. Data on costs will be extracted. Studies will be selected for inclusion by title and abstract review by two reviewers. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) flow diagram will document the selection process. A standardised form will be used to extract data. Data quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials, a narrative synthesis will be completed and the GRADE assessment tool used to comment on evidence quality. A meta-analysis of effect size of primary outcomes and subgroup analysis for multimorbidity and social deprivation will be performed if there are sufficient comparable data. This systematic review will give an important overview of the evidence for the use of link workers providing social prescribing and health and social care coordination in primary care. This will help inform intervention development and guide policy makers on whether these interventions are cost effective and which groups stand to benefit most. CRD42019134737 (04/07/2019).
联络专员在社会处方以及健康与社会护理协调方面的应用正在增加,但缺乏足够数据来证明其有效性以及对哪些人群效果最佳。多重疾病的患病率正在上升,且在贫困地区的人群比富裕地区的人群早十年受到影响。本系统评价旨在考察联络专员在改善健康结局方面的有效性及成本的证据。我们还将寻找专门针对患有多重疾病的人群以及贫困地区人群使用联络专员的证据。将检索已发表文献数据库和灰色文献数据库,以查找与常规护理相比,针对社区居住成年人在初级保健中使用联络专员的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验。主要结局将是与健康相关的生活质量和心理健康。将提取成本数据。两名评审员将通过标题和摘要评审来选择纳入研究。系统评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA)流程图将记录选择过程。将使用标准化表格来提取数据。将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具对随机对照试验的数据质量进行评估,将完成叙述性综合分析,并使用GRADE评估工具对证据质量进行评价。如果有足够的可比数据,将对主要结局的效应大小进行荟萃分析,并对多重疾病和社会剥夺进行亚组分析。本系统评价将对在初级保健中使用联络专员提供社会处方以及健康与社会护理协调的证据进行重要概述。这将有助于为干预措施的制定提供信息,并指导政策制定者了解这些干预措施是否具有成本效益以及哪些群体最有可能从中受益。CRD42019134737(2019年7月4日)