Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jan;160(1):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative (QI) to adopt universal screening for Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer patients at an institution that previously employed age-based screening.
Prior to the initiative, tumors of patients with uterine cancer diagnosed at age ≤ 60 years were screened for mismatch repair deficiency (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). The QI process change model adopted universal testing of all uterine cancer specimens and implemented provider training, standardized documentation, and enhanced use of the electronic medical record (EMR). We compared screening rates, results of screening, follow up of abnormal results, and final diagnoses from the pre- and post-implementation periods.
Pre- and post-implementation screening rates for women age ≤ 60 years at the time of diagnosis were 45/78 (57.7%) and 64/68 (94.5%), respectively. The screening rate for all patients with uterine cancer increased from 73/190 (38.4%) to 172/182 (94.5%). The rate of abnormal screening results increased from 15/190 (7.9%) to 44/182 (24.0%) cases. Genetics referral rates among screen positives increased from 3/15 (20.0%) to 16/44 (36.4%). Germline diagnoses increased from 2/190 (1.1%) with two Lynch syndrome diagnoses to 4/182 (2.2%) including three Lynch syndrome diagnoses and one BRCA1 germline diagnosis. The number of patients errantly not screened decreased from at least 32 patients to 3 patients after the intervention.
Adherence to screening guidelines significantly improved after interventions involving provider education, optimal use of the EMR, and simplification of screening indications. These interventions are feasible at other institutions and translatable to other screening indications.
确定在先前采用基于年龄的筛查的机构中,采用普遍筛查子宫癌患者林奇综合征的质量改进计划(QI)的可行性和有效性。
在该计划之前,对诊断年龄≤60 岁的子宫癌患者的肿瘤进行错配修复缺陷(MMR)和微卫星不稳定性(MSI)筛查。QI 过程改变模型采用对所有子宫癌标本进行普遍检测,并实施了提供者培训、标准化文件记录以及增强电子病历(EMR)的使用。我们比较了实施前后的筛查率、筛查结果、异常结果的随访以及最终诊断。
在诊断时年龄≤60 岁的女性的实施前后筛查率分别为 45/78(57.7%)和 64/68(94.5%)。所有子宫癌患者的筛查率从 73/190(38.4%)增加到 172/182(94.5%)。异常筛查结果的发生率从 15/190(7.9%)增加到 44/182(24.0%)例。阳性筛查者的遗传咨询率从 3/15(20.0%)增加到 16/44(36.4%)。种系诊断率从 190 例中有 2 例(1.1%)林奇综合征诊断增加到 182 例中有 4 例(2.2%),包括 3 例林奇综合征诊断和 1 例 BRCA1 种系诊断。干预后,错误未筛查的患者数量从至少 32 例减少到 3 例。
在涉及提供者教育、最佳使用 EMR 和简化筛查指征的干预措施后,对筛查指南的遵守情况显著改善。这些干预措施在其他机构是可行的,并可转化为其他筛查指征。