Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Anatomy, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 Aug 31;29(3). doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2046Bayrak06.
The aim of this study was to evaluate marginal and internal fit of ceramic inlays designed with different computer-aided design software programs.
11 typodont mandibular first molars were prepared as a ceramic class II mesioocclusal inlay cavity. Teeth were scanned using 3Shape TRIOS Intraoral Dental Scanner. The scan data, which was obtained in the form of a STL file, was designed in three different CAD systems (CEREC, KaVo, and Planmeca). The obtained STL scan data was exported to design inlay using three different CAD systems (CEREC, KaVo, and Planmeca). An independent 5-axis milling unit was used to manufacture the feldspatic inlay restorations. 11 measurements for each teeth were made by using micro-ct to evaluate the marginal and internal fit. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the statistical difference between groups, and Tukey posthoc test was used to determine intra-group differences.
According to repeated ANOVA test results, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups for the variables A, D, and F. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in linear measurements for other measurement points and volumetric measurements (p⟩0.05).
Software programs of different systems affects the marginal and internal fit of inlay restorations.
本研究旨在评估不同计算机辅助设计软件设计的陶瓷嵌体的边缘和内部适合性。
11 个牙体模型下颌第一磨牙被制备为陶瓷 II 类近中-远中嵌体腔。使用 3Shape TRIOS 口内牙科扫描仪对牙齿进行扫描。扫描数据以 STL 文件的形式获得,在三个不同的 CAD 系统(CEREC、KaVo 和 Planmeca)中进行设计。获得的 STL 扫描数据通过三个不同的 CAD 系统(CEREC、KaVo 和 Planmeca)导出用于设计嵌体。使用独立的 5 轴铣削单元制造长石质嵌体修复体。通过 micro-CT 对每个牙齿进行 11 次测量,以评估边缘和内部适合性。采用单因素方差分析(One-way ANOVA)比较组间差异,采用 Tukey 事后检验(Tukey posthoc test)比较组内差异。
根据重复方差分析(repeated ANOVA)的结果,在变量 A、D 和 F 方面,各组之间存在统计学差异。在其他测量点的线性测量和体积测量方面,各组之间没有统计学差异(p⟩0.05)。
不同系统的软件程序会影响嵌体修复体的边缘和内部适合性。