Suppr超能文献

三维打印间接修复体的力学及粘结特性评估

Evaluation of the Mechanical and Adhesion Characteristics of Indirect Restorations Manufactured with Three-Dimensional Printing.

作者信息

Peskersoy Cem, Oguzhan Aybeniz

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University, 35030 Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;16(5):613. doi: 10.3390/polym16050613.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the marginal fit and bond strength characteristics of onlay restorations manufactured by three-dimensional printing (Varseo XS, Bego GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and CAD/CAM (CAMcube, Montreal, QC, Canada) systems. Class II onlay cavities on sixty mandibular molars were prepared in cavities and restored in three separate groups using different fabrication methods. Digital and conventional impressions were taken to design the restorations in the CAD system (DWOS, Straumann GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). To evaluate the marginal fit and void volumes, all specimens were scanned with microcomputed tomography. A microshear test was performed to compare the bond strength of the restorations to the tooth surface. The marginal fit values measured for the 3D-printed and CAD/CAM onlay restorations were found to be at clinically acceptable levels (<120 µm), and no significant difference could be observed between the three different fabrication methods ( > 0.05). According to the microshear test results, the CAD/CAM group had the highest bond strength values before (34.82 MPa) and after (26.87 MPa) thermal cycling ( < 0.05), while the 3D-printed and conventionally produced onlays had similar results ( < 0.05). 3D printing technology is a promising option for indirect restorations; however, the post-production phase is as crucial as the printing and cementation phases.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查通过三维打印(Varseo XS,德国不来梅贝格公司)和CAD/CAM(加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔市的CAMcube)系统制造的嵌体修复体的边缘适合性和粘结强度特征。在60颗下颌磨牙上制备Ⅱ类嵌体窝洞,并使用不同的制作方法将其分为三组进行修复。采用数字印模和传统印模在CAD系统(德国弗赖堡市的Straumann公司的DWOS)中设计修复体。为了评估边缘适合性和空隙体积,所有标本均用微型计算机断层扫描进行扫描。进行微剪切试验以比较修复体与牙面的粘结强度。发现3D打印和CAD/CAM嵌体修复体的边缘适合性值处于临床可接受水平(<120 µm),并且三种不同制作方法之间未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。根据微剪切试验结果,CAD/CAM组在热循环之前(34.82 MPa)和之后(26.87 MPa)具有最高的粘结强度值(<0.05),而3D打印和传统制作的嵌体结果相似(<0.05)。3D打印技术是间接修复的一个有前景的选择;然而,制作后阶段与打印和粘结阶段同样关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8331/10934380/a9bff70438dc/polymers-16-00613-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验