Suppr超能文献

因 COVID-19 大流行而入住急诊室的急性胆囊炎患者的临床处理方法和经皮胆囊造口术经验。

Clinical approach to patients admitted to the emergency room due to acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic and percutaneous cholecystostomy experience.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, İstanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Health Science University, İstanbul Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021 Jan;27(1):34-42. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.80083.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute cholecystitis (AC), a common complication of gallstones, is responsible for a significant part of emergency applications, and cholecystectomy is the only definitive treatment method for AC. Early cholecystectomy has many reported advantages. Operation-related morbidity and mortality have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, our aim is to present our general clinical approach to patients who were diagnosed with AC during the pandemic and our percutaneous cholecystostomy experience during this period.

METHODS

This study included 72 patients who were presented to our hospital's emergency room between March 11 and May 31, 2020, with AC. Patients were divided into three groups based on their treatment: outpatients (Group 1), inpatients (Group 2) and patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (Group 3). These three groups were compared by their demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

There were 36 (50%) patients in Group 1, 25 (34.7%) patients in Group 2, and 11 (15.3%) patients in Group 3. The demographic characteristics of the patients were similar. The CRP and WBC levels of the patients in Group 3 were significantly higher compared to the other groups. Moreover, the wall of the gallbladder was thicker and the size of the gallbladder was larger in Group 3. Patients had percutaneous cholecystostomy at the median of 3.5 days and the length of hospital stay was longer compared to Group 2 (3.9 days versus 9.2 days, p=0.00). The rate of re-hospitalization after discharge was similar in Group 2 and Group 3, but none of the patients in Group 1 required hospitalization. None of 72 patients developed an emergency condition requiring surgery, and there was no death.

CONCLUSION

Although many publications emphasize that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be performed with low morbidity at the first admission in acute cholecystitis, it is a clinical condition that can be delayed in the COVID-19 pandemic and other similar emergencies. Thus, percutaneous cholecystostomy should be effectively employed, and its indications should be extended if necessary (e.g., younger patients, patients with lower CCI or ASA). This approach may enable us to protect both patients and healthcare professionals that perform the operation from the risk of COVID-19.

摘要

背景

急性胆囊炎(AC)是胆石症的常见并发症,占急诊就诊的很大一部分,胆囊切除术是 AC 的唯一确定性治疗方法。早期胆囊切除术有许多报道的优势。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,与手术相关的发病率和死亡率有所增加。在本研究中,我们的目的是介绍我们在大流行期间对被诊断为 AC 的患者的一般临床方法,以及在此期间经皮胆囊造口术的经验。

方法

本研究纳入了 2020 年 3 月 11 日至 5 月 31 日期间因 AC 就诊于我院急诊科的 72 例患者。根据治疗方法,患者分为三组:门诊(第 1 组)、住院(第 2 组)和经皮胆囊造口术(第 3 组)。通过比较三组患者的人口统计学和临床特征。

结果

第 1 组有 36 例(50%)患者,第 2 组有 25 例(34.7%)患者,第 3 组有 11 例(15.3%)患者。患者的人口统计学特征相似。第 3 组患者的 CRP 和 WBC 水平明显高于其他两组。此外,第 3 组患者的胆囊壁更厚,胆囊更大。患者在第 3 组的中位时间为 3.5 天进行经皮胆囊造口术,住院时间也比第 2 组长(3.9 天与 9.2 天,p=0.00)。第 2 组和第 3 组的出院后再住院率相似,但第 1 组没有患者需要住院。72 例患者均未发生需要手术的紧急情况,也无死亡病例。

结论

尽管许多文献强调在急性胆囊炎的首次就诊中可以通过腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)以较低的发病率进行手术,但在 COVID-19 大流行和其他类似的紧急情况下,这是一种可以延迟的临床情况。因此,应有效地进行经皮胆囊造口术,如果需要(例如,年轻患者、CCI 或 ASA 评分较低的患者),应扩大其适应证。这种方法可以使我们能够保护患者和进行手术的医护人员免受 COVID-19 的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验