Departments of Ophthalmology (EH, RAS, JHP, MD, NJN, VB), Pediatrics (JHP), Neurology (NJN, VB), and Neurological Surgery (NJN), Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia .
J Neuroophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;41(4):e523-e534. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001136.
Unilateral isolated optic disc edema (UIODE) represents a challenging clinical presentation that frequently precipitates an extensive diagnostic work-up. Patients without an apparent diagnosis despite appropriate investigations are often categorized as having "papillophlebitis," an entity that is poorly defined in the existing literature. Our aim was to describe the characteristics of a series of patients with paucisymptomatic UIODE, determine the optimal diagnostic approach to such cases, and clarify the clinical features of presumed papillophlebitis.
We retrospectively identified 29 patients with UIODE who were seen by neuro-ophthalmologists at a single center between 2005 and 2019. Each patient presented with isolated, unilateral disc edema that was either entirely asymptomatic or associated with minimal visual symptoms. Patients underwent a comprehensive neuro-ophthalmic evaluation and several ophthalmic and systemic investigations. Data from the initial visit and all subsequent clinical visits were collected, including patient demographics, examination findings, and details of the diagnostic work-up.
Our 29 patients with UIODE were found to have a variety of underlying diagnoses including unilateral papilledema due to idiopathic intracranial hypertension (10 patients), optic nerve sheath meningioma (5), incipient nonarteritic anterior ischemic neuropathy (4), vitreopapillary traction (3), orbital masses (2), a peripapillary choroidal neovascular membrane (1), and presumed papillophlebitis (4). The duration of disc edema varied considerably based on the etiology, but most patients had favorable visual outcomes.
A systematic approach to the evaluation of UIODE, combined with long-term follow-up, led to a definite diagnosis in a majority of patients, with only 4 patients presumed to have papillophlebitis, a diagnosis the actual existence of which remains controversial.
单侧孤立性视盘水肿(UIODE)是一种具有挑战性的临床表现,常需要进行广泛的诊断性检查。尽管进行了适当的检查,但仍未能明确诊断的患者通常被归类为患有“视盘炎”,而这种疾病在现有文献中定义不明确。我们的目的是描述一系列表现为症状轻微的 UIODE 患者的特征,确定此类病例的最佳诊断方法,并阐明疑似视盘炎的临床特征。
我们回顾性地确定了 2005 年至 2019 年期间在一家单中心就诊的 29 例 UIODE 患者。每位患者均表现为孤立性、单侧视盘水肿,要么完全无症状,要么仅伴有轻微的视觉症状。患者接受了全面的神经眼科评估以及多项眼科和全身检查。收集了每位患者初次就诊和所有后续就诊的资料,包括患者的人口统计学资料、检查结果以及诊断性检查的详细信息。
我们发现,29 例 UIODE 患者存在多种潜在诊断,包括特发性颅内压增高所致单侧视乳头水肿(10 例)、视神经鞘脑膜瘤(5 例)、初期非动脉炎性前部缺血性视神经病变(4 例)、玻璃体视盘牵引(3 例)、眼眶肿块(2 例)、视盘旁脉络膜新生血管膜(1 例)和疑似视盘炎(4 例)。根据病因,视盘水肿的持续时间差异较大,但大多数患者的视力预后良好。
对 UIODE 进行系统评估,并结合长期随访,使大多数患者能够明确诊断,只有 4 例患者被推测为视盘炎,但该疾病的实际存在仍存在争议。