Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Pain. 2021 Jun 1;162(6):1632-1640. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002161.
Back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is common in older adults. No clinical prediction models for poor long-term outcomes have been developed in older patients with back pain. This study aimed to develop and internally validate 3 clinical prediction models for nonrecovery in this population. A prospective cohort study in general practice was conducted (Back Complaints in the Elders, Netherlands), including 675 patients >55 years with a new episode of care for back pain. Three definitions of nonrecovery were used combining 6-month and 12-month follow-up data: (1) persistent back pain, (2) persistent disability, and (3) perceived nonrecovery. Sample size calculation resulted in a maximum of 14 candidate predictors that were selected from back pain prognostic literature and clinical experience. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the models (backward selection procedure). Models' performance was evaluated with explained variance (Nagelkerke's R2), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test), and discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) measures. The models were internally validated in 250 bootstrapped samples to correct for overoptimism. All 3 models displayed good overall performance during development and internal validation (ie, R2 > 30%; AUC > 0.77). The model predicting persistent disability performed best, showing good calibration, discrimination (AUC 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.89; optimism-adjusted AUC 0.85), and explained variance (R2 49%, optimism-adjusted R2 46%). Common predictors in all models were: age, chronic duration, disability, a recent back pain episode, and patients' recovery expectations. Spinal morning stiffness and pain during spinal rotation were included in 2 of 3 models. These models should be externally validated before being used in a clinical primary care setting.
背痛是全球导致残疾的主要原因,在老年人中较为常见。对于患有背痛的老年患者,目前尚未制定出针对长期预后不良的临床预测模型。本研究旨在为该人群开发和内部验证 3 种用于预测不良恢复的临床预测模型。这是一项在普通诊所开展的前瞻性队列研究(荷兰老年人腰痛研究),纳入了 675 名年龄>55 岁、新发腰痛的患者。使用结合了 6 个月和 12 个月随访数据的 3 种非恢复定义来定义非恢复:(1)持续性背痛,(2)持续性残疾,和(3)感知非恢复。样本量计算得出,最多可从腰痛预后文献和临床经验中选择 14 个候选预测因素。使用多变量逻辑回归来开发模型(逐步向后选择程序)。使用解释方差(Nagelkerke R2)、校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验)和区分度(曲线下面积 [AUC])来评估模型的性能。在 250 个 bootstrap 样本中对模型进行内部验证,以纠正过度拟合。在开发和内部验证期间,所有 3 种模型均显示出良好的整体性能(即 R2>30%;AUC>0.77)。预测持续性残疾的模型表现最佳,显示出良好的校准、区分度(AUC 0.86,95%置信区间 0.83-0.89;校正后 AUC 0.85)和解释方差(R2 49%,校正后 R2 46%)。所有模型的常见预测因素包括:年龄、慢性病程、残疾、近期腰痛发作和患者的恢复预期。脊柱晨僵和脊柱旋转时的疼痛被纳入 3 个模型中的 2 个。在临床初级保健环境中使用之前,应先对外验证这些模型。