ICMR Regional Medical Research Centre NE, Dibrugarh, India.
Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Jan 1;98(1):81-87. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001622.
A differential outcome in randomized controlled trials of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, including ranibizumab, for diabetic macular edema is a major dilemma for planning, optimizing, and managing clinical usage. The variable outcome of the therapeutics necessitates the importance of finding a predictive biomarker for anti-VEGF therapy to improve subject selection.
Our study correlates the baseline pro- and anti-VEGF isoforms and its three receptors (VEGFReceptor1, VEGFReceptor2, and VEGFReceptor3) for circulatory candidate protein molecules among diabetic patients with macular edema, with the clinical outcome of ranibizumab therapy.
This study included 86 individuals who were anti-VEGF naive at the time of ascertainment but have completed the standardized therapy regimen of the clinic. Plasma proteins for pro- and anti-VEGF isoforms and its three receptors were determined in replicate by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The study demonstrated that 56 (65.12%) individuals benefited from the therapy in terms of letter gain (Snellen chart). Baseline plasma soluble VEGF receptor 2 (sVEGFR-2) was significantly higher among responders (65.10 pg/mL; 95% confidence interval, 55.41 to 74.80 pg/mL) compared with nonresponders (46.38 pg/mL; 95% confidence interval, 38.69 to 54.07 pg/mL; PFDR = .03). Diffuse diabetic macular edema with proliferative diabetic retinopathy increases the risk of nonresponse to the therapy by 3.03-fold (PFDR = .04).
The present study postulates that diffuse diabetic macular edema with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and baseline circulatory soluble VEGF receptor 2 may be potential candidates as therapy-stratifying markers for ranibizumab treatment among patients with diabetic macular edema.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)拮抗剂(如雷珠单抗)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的随机对照试验结果存在差异,这给治疗方案的规划、优化和临床应用带来了重大难题。由于这些治疗方法的结果存在差异,因此需要寻找 VEGF 治疗的预测生物标志物,以改善患者选择。
本研究旨在分析糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者基线状态下的促血管生成和抗血管生成 VEGF 异构体及其三个受体(VEGF 受体 1、VEGF 受体 2 和 VEGF 受体 3)与雷珠单抗治疗临床疗效的相关性。
本研究共纳入 86 例初次接受 VEGF 治疗的黄斑水肿患者,这些患者在入组时已完成标准化治疗方案。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法重复检测患者的血浆蛋白中促血管生成和抗血管生成 VEGF 异构体及其三个受体。
研究结果显示,56 例(65.12%)患者的视力得到了提高(Snellen 图表)。与无应答者(46.38 pg/mL;95%置信区间,38.69 至 54.07 pg/mL)相比,应答者的基线血浆可溶性 VEGF 受体 2(sVEGFR-2)水平显著更高(65.10 pg/mL;95%置信区间,55.41 至 74.80 pg/mL;PFDR =.03)。弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿合并增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变会使治疗无应答的风险增加 3.03 倍(PFDR =.04)。
本研究提出,弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿合并增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变以及基线循环可溶性 VEGF 受体 2 可能是糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者接受雷珠单抗治疗的潜在治疗分层标志物。