Suppr超能文献

罕见出血性疾病的流行病学挑战:血友病 A 患者中 FVIII 抑制剂的发生率——一个已知但未知起源的问题。

Epidemiological Challenges in Rare Bleeding Disorders: FVIII Inhibitor Incidence in Haemophilia A Patients-A Known Issue of Unknown Origin.

机构信息

German Haemophilia Registry, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, 63225 Langen, Germany.

Safety of Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, 63225 Langen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010225.

Abstract

There is a broad range of factor products approved in Germany for haemophilia A treatment. Since the introduction of recombinant coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) products in the 1990s, there has been substantial debate whether there is a difference in inhibitor incidence between single FVIII products or product classes. Neither haemophilia registries nor clinical studies, including a randomised controlled clinical trial, provided a consistent and definite answer. The reasons were mainly related to methodological challenges in conducting controlled studies in a rare disease. In this analysis, the most relevant epidemiological challenges and main problems were examined, including study bias, potential overlap of individual studies and advanced development of therapy and methods in the course of time. Meta-analyses on two levels showed that therapies using recombinant products resulted in different event rates when compared to plasma-derived products. These results are accompanied by substantial study heterogeneity evidenced by Cochran's Q tests. Only three studies have been identified that meet the standards of current clinical guidance. To finally resolve this ongoing and disputable safety issue of replacement therapy, collaboration among registry owners, academia and regulators must be fostered.

摘要

德国有广泛的因子产品批准用于治疗甲型血友病。自 20 世纪 90 年代重组凝血因子 VIII(FVIII)产品问世以来,人们一直在争论单一 FVIII 产品或产品类别之间是否存在抑制剂发生率的差异。血友病登记处或临床研究,包括一项随机对照临床试验,都没有提供一致和明确的答案。原因主要与在罕见疾病中进行对照研究的方法学挑战有关。在这项分析中,检查了最相关的流行病学挑战和主要问题,包括研究偏倚、个别研究的潜在重叠以及随着时间的推移治疗和方法的先进发展。两个层次的荟萃分析表明,与血浆衍生产品相比,使用重组产品的治疗会导致不同的事件发生率。这些结果伴随着考克兰 Q 检验证明的实质性研究异质性。只有三项研究符合当前临床指南的标准。为了最终解决这种持续存在且有争议的替代治疗安全性问题,必须促进登记处所有者、学术界和监管机构之间的合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/7795862/8577c482849e/ijerph-18-00225-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验