Lew Klein College of Media and Communication, Temple University.
Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College.
Health Commun. 2022 May;37(5):548-560. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1857506. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Using Galileo theory and method of multidimensional scaling (MDS), we compared the psychological distances between concepts related to two pandemic viruses, Zika and COVID-19. Surveys (Zika, 410; COVID-19, = 291) were used to investigate the role of media use and interpersonal communication on the relationship between 10 concepts in multidimensional spaces. We asked these four research questions: Do the two spaces represent the two pandemics similarly? What is the relationship of and of to each pandemic? What is the effect of virus-related media use and interpersonal talk on the pandemic space? What are optimal messages for moving closer to and to ? Media use influenced the distances for both pandemics: With greater media use, the concepts were closer in the Zika space and further apart in the COVID-19 space. Interpersonal communication was associated with few differences in the spaces. Based on the psychological distances between concepts, optimal messages were identified: For Zika, a message with two concepts, and , is predicted to be most effective to move to the concept , whereas for COVID-19, a message with is predicted to be most effective to move to .
运用伽利略理论和多维尺度分析(MDS)方法,我们比较了与两种大流行病毒(寨卡病毒和 COVID-19)相关概念的心理距离。我们使用调查(寨卡病毒,410 人;COVID-19,=291 人)来研究媒体使用和人际交流在多维空间中 10 个概念之间关系中的作用。我们提出了以下四个研究问题:这两个空间是否类似地代表了这两种大流行?与这两种大流行的关系如何?与病毒相关的媒体使用和人际交流对大流行空间有什么影响?将 移向 和 的最佳信息是什么?媒体使用影响了这两种大流行的距离:媒体使用量越大,寨卡空间中的概念越接近,而 COVID-19 空间中的概念则越远。人际交流在空间中几乎没有差异。基于概念之间的心理距离,确定了最佳信息:对于寨卡病毒,包含两个概念 和 的信息最有可能有效地将 移至概念 ,而对于 COVID-19,包含 的信息最有可能有效地将 移至 。